Man I een had nothin ta do and I picked up a copy of the Journal fer Wednesday or there abouts and read the editorial section and was so surprise of the crap the editor put there!

Ya talk crap...all over the place...! Bouy TALK bout "slick" implications that them people mussie was victimized cos plenty of them said that they were!

Nah...any fool een ger say or imply that all them cries are false...just as he who says all them are true is either a fool or Fred Mitchell playing politics...OR THE EDITOR OF THE JOURNAL...it currently seems!

Nah back to the editor! He/she needs to live the moto of the paper..."SING FER NO SUPPER"...OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT!

ANYBODY ROUND HERE HAVE A HANDLE WHO THAT PERSON IS???:dgi:

Man I een had nothin ta do and I picked up a copy of the Journal fer Wednesday or there abouts and read the editorial section and was so surprise of the crap the editor put there!
Ya talk crap...all over the place...! Bouy TALK bout "slick" implications that them people mussie was victimized cos plenty of them said that they were!
Nah...any fool een ger say or imply that all them cries are false...just as he who says all them are true is either a fool or Fred Mitchell playing politics...OR THE EDITOR OF THE JOURNAL...it currently seems!
Nah back to the editor! He/she needs to live the moto of the paper..."SING FER NO SUPPER"...OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT!
ANYBODY ROUND HERE HAVE A HANDLE WHO THAT PERSON IS???:dgi:

The Tribune does do that same type of crap...Just blatant editorial crap...but sadly the Tribune's crap does spill onto their front page.

The Tribune does do that same type of crap...Just blatant editorial crap...but sadly the Tribune's crap does spill onto their front page.


They just want to attack the journal, because it's owner is a PLP. Nothing to do with the journal's reporting, it is just because it has a PLP owner.

The journal has the best integrity in this town. I said the Guardian was crap, and it had Charles Carter as the CEO. The Guardian has gone way down, but the people were still loyal too it; even though they could not spell.

Don't mind licks2. She is just attacking the journal, because it has a PLP owner; regardless of how fair it is, or how many reporters at the journal has free reign to write their articles.

They just want to attack the journal, because it's owner is a PLP. Nothing to do with the journal's reporting, it is just because it has a PLP owner.
The journal has the best integrity in this town. I said the Guardian was crap, and it had Charles Carter as the CEO. The Guardian has gone way down, but the people were still loyal too it; even though they could not spell.
Don't mind licks2. She is just attacking the journal, because it has a PLP owner; regardless of how fair it is, or how many reporters at the journal has free reign to write their articles.


One thing for sure, Licks2 could not write for any of the Bahamian newspapers, thats what is so sad here. If Licks2 was to write an editorial in the manner that they write it, it would go in the garbage fast.

One thing for sure, Licks2 could not write for any of the Bahamian newspapers, thats what is so sad here. If Licks2 was to write an editorial in the manner that they write it, it would go in the garbage fast.

Or, they would put her in the cartoon section for pure jokes!
:voodoo:

Or, they would put her in the cartoon section for pure jokes!
:voodoo:

Why is it that when the PLP is in govt and fire someone who is known to be an FNM supporter-that's called victimization???

But when the FNM is the govt and they fire someone who is known to be a PLP supporter-that's called "cleaning up the country of those corrupt persons which seem to only be PLPs????

Could someone explain this to me???

Why is it that when the PLP is in govt and fire someone who is known to be an FNM supporter-that's called victimization???
But when the FNM is the govt and they fire someone who is known to be a PLP supporter-that's called "cleaning up the country of those corrupt persons which seem to only be PLPs????
Could someone explain this to me???


They are mean objective. Simply put, they are mean selfish partisan hacks, and now the PLP know's that this time, they need to cut their throats regardless of who feels it, IF, they do not do their work and are stalling on you. Don't jack em up all together, but make the rules for them to follow, and as the people in BAIC got off easy, this time, pass legislation to ensure you get an effective team on board to ensure your rules and regulations are followed. Because, it was a better plan it was just that it was not followed...as opposed to the FNM, and the general consensus of that trip of a Manifesto, and their lack of a plan. That Manifesto sure did have a few glossy prints in it now didn't it!?!?

However, some of these PS's, if I were the PM and Perry Chirstie, regardless of how many times they show up to my family functions, or how many times they meet me out for drinks, they would have gotten dealt with if they did not follow my orders.

But, Christie was in a no-win situation, and to me, he has done his best at making sure the PLP is a viable government, barring all of the corruption details that hit the party in the late-80s leading up to 92. He has restored faith in the party to many middle of the road people, but, some people, like CG, Lurker and a few others, would rather hold onto relics of the 60s and 70s. In the meantime, Bahamians are generally conservative and they like "old things" and the feeling of going back to the way "things were", just that this time, the FNM is reminiscent of how someone who got bit by a Vampire in the movies, turned into a Vampire themselves and their friends have not yet seen it all, so they are tricked into thinking that these people are on the up and up with them, but, are clearly not what things should be from a government.

For example, look at Tommy T on crime...
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-3441--25-25--.html
“There is no fairy godmother waiting to wave a magic wand and make crime disappear...”

and....
"I am told, for example, that you are now well-versed on the matter of corruption in policing. That policy is zero tolerance on corruption...”

What was his vision, and, what was his plan to make sure that in fact they are well-versed on these things? If he depended on what we had last year, the police force will give us more of the same; corrupt, FNM-ized, people killing animals in uniform, with more crime to boot. Saying we "made sure you got the tools you need", does not say exactly what it is the tools you gave, how will it help and what strategies you put in place to ensure that you did not waste money, training more dummies, as you have said comes into the force by virtue of their applications, and, defining for the next generation of administrators, to come in anf follow that pattern so that we have a continual flow of found, tried and acceptably agreed upon procedure for all of us to follow and say, yes, this is what needs to be done, when where and why!

I feel like we need the gong-show, and hook him off by the neck when the crowd starts to boo and jeer!
:tdown:

I dont read the Tribune, nor the Punch, actually I only read the online media, which is the Guardian and the Journal. It did seem at one point that the journals "editorials" were somewhat anti FNM, cant say that they are PLP, but then those are just editorials, they are not the news. Same goes with the Guardians Editorials, they have their own personal thing too.

But the biggest thing I DID notice was how Anti-US the Journal is on a whole, whether it is just the editor, I dont know, but I keep seeing these personal opinionated Anti-US articles posted under the National Story section, and it makes me really shame to call that writer a fellow Bahamian.

Point is, stay away from the opinionated articles (not the news) then they are all okay.

I don't read the local dailys ..ok ok ok the punch once in a blue moon..its the same thing over and over.. shyt i heard before so makes no sense wasting 75 cents every morning is it 75 cents or a dollar now..goes to show i don't read the papers cuz i don't even know the price

Why is it that when the PLP is in govt and fire someone who is known to be an FNM supporter-that's called victimization???
But when the FNM is the govt and they fire someone who is known to be a PLP supporter-that's called "cleaning up the country of those corrupt persons which seem to only be PLPs????
Could someone explain this to me???



I think Objective that you can fire folk for cause, and even then there is a process, long and drawn out as it is.If you are on probation however then your supervisor controls your destiny, and you have no right to anything. Transient politicians should not be interfering with folk which is why there is a process.Remember the referendum debacle? Back then the talk was the process was wrong. Different tune now, but that is politics. Nothing wrong with hiring your supporters, but there should be legitimate need, and you should follow the proper procedure. An established Civil servant cannot be fired. BJ, Fred and Sears know this. Everyone knows this. This is all politics. The whirlwind will be reaped by the troublemakers when their time comes. An established civil servant has an appointment letter from the Governor General. If any government wants to create a jobs programme then they should do so through legislation, and be transparent about it.People who need help because they are down on their luck can get help from Social Services.

I think Objective that you can fire folk for cause, and even then there is a process, long and drawn out as it is.If you are on probation however then your supervisor controls your destiny, and you have no right to anything. Transient politicians should not be interfering with folk which is why there is a process.Remember the referendum debacle? Back then the talk was the process was wrong. Different tune now, but that is politics. Nothing wrong with hiring your supporters, but there should be legitimate need, and you should follow the proper procedure. An established Civil servant cannot be fired. BJ, Fred and Sears know this. Everyone knows this. This is all politics. The whirlwind will be reaped by the troublemakers when their time comes. An established civil servant has an appointment letter from the Governor General. If any government wants to create a jobs programme then they should do so through legislation, and be transparent about it.People who need help because they are down on their luck can get help from Social Services.


politicians need to stay out of business ... dont hire and dont fire .. they have no place ..

Why is it that when the PLP is in govt and fire someone who is known to be an FNM supporter-that's called victimization???
But when the FNM is the govt and they fire someone who is known to be a PLP supporter-that's called "cleaning up the country of those corrupt persons which seem to only be PLPs????
Could someone explain this to me???


What we should ask, is why does the government go on a mass hiring spree immideately before election?

I think Objective that you can fire folk for cause, and even then there is a process, long and drawn out as it is.If you are on probation however then your supervisor controls your destiny, and you have no right to anything. Transient politicians should not be interfering with folk which is why there is a process.Remember the referendum debacle? Back then the talk was the process was wrong. Different tune now, but that is politics. Nothing wrong with hiring your supporters, but there should be legitimate need, and you should follow the proper procedure. An established Civil servant cannot be fired. BJ, Fred and Sears know this. Everyone knows this. This is all politics. The whirlwind will be reaped by the troublemakers when their time comes. An established civil servant has an appointment letter from the Governor General. If any government wants to create a jobs programme then they should do so through legislation, and be transparent about it.People who need help because they are down on their luck can get help from Social Services.


No MP should be near the civil service hiring mechanism. They are representatives, not the heads of human resources.

What we should ask, is why does the government go on a mass hiring spree immideately before election?

Good question, because they ALL do it! The sad thing is, most of the pre-election hires don't even know or bother to find out the conditions under which they are being employed. All they know is "they gettin' a job".

They just want to attack the journal, because it's owner is a PLP. Nothing to do with the journal's reporting, it is just because it has a PLP owner.
The journal has the best integrity in this town. I said the Guardian was crap, and it had Charles Carter as the CEO. The Guardian has gone way down, but the people were still loyal too it; even though they could not spell.
Don't mind licks2. She is just attacking the journal, because it has a PLP owner; regardless of how fair it is, or how many reporters at the journal has free reign to write their articles.

Pray tell who is the PLP ya talkin bout! So he...whomever he be...has a right to write drivle and none er we must have the same right?:gi:

Buoy... I paid my money fer that rag and you nor ya ma ger tell me what to tink bout it! If it wrote shed...it wrote shed! NAH LUMP IT MR!