Lurker
01-22-08, - 02:04 PM
My peeps tell me that lawyer Michael Barnett will seek remuneration of over $1 million dollars in legal fees from Allyson for the Pinewood case.
|
View Full Version : Who wants to be a millionaire ? Lurker 01-22-08, - 02:04 PM My peeps tell me that lawyer Michael Barnett will seek remuneration of over $1 million dollars in legal fees from Allyson for the Pinewood case. The Exotic One 01-22-08, - 02:07 PM My peeps tell me that lawyer Michael Barnett will seek remuneration of over $1 million dollars in legal fees from Allyson for the Pinewood case. Dern it I in da wrong profession agen!!!!! SMT lol CG 01-22-08, - 02:15 PM Wow! A million $$$? Ones day in court don’t come cheap! Truthseeker 01-22-08, - 02:34 PM My peeps tell me that lawyer Michael Barnett will seek remuneration of over $1 million dollars in legal fees from Allyson for the Pinewood case. One million dollars and she still lost. There is a sucker born everyday as P.T. Barnum once said and it looks like Alyson got suckered and goosied, but this is small change for her. I believe her parliamentary declaration form indicated a net worth in excess of 10 million dollars. FoXxY 01-22-08, - 02:37 PM My peeps tell me that lawyer Michael Barnett will seek remuneration of over $1 million dollars in legal fees from Allyson for the Pinewood case. *sucks teeth* thats all he want 1 million dollars..f he fool ey?? he should of hit her harder cause she have that and more bahamianpride 01-22-08, - 02:46 PM she won the challenge didn't she... she said there were improper votes... and there were... i don't think this case qualifies... scottbahamas 01-22-08, - 03:54 PM She challenged on the basis that she was the duly elected MP for Pinewood. She did not succeed in her challenge. She lost. bahamianpride 01-22-08, - 03:58 PM She challenged on the basis that she was the duly elected MP for Pinewood. She did not succeed in her challenge. She lost. she can't challenge on that basis... she can assert that she is... she can challenge on the grounds that their were illegal/improper conduct etc... the rules weren't followed... cheating fraud.. etc... GB-Bahamian-Boy 01-22-08, - 04:02 PM she can't challenge on that basis... she can assert that she is... she can challenge on the grounds that their were illegal/improper conduct etc... the rules weren't followed... cheating fraud.. etc... Go ready the court transcripts den come back and talk sense. bahamianpride 01-22-08, - 04:06 PM Go ready the court transcripts den come back and talk sense. better i ready them than you...lol :bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy: Lurker 01-22-08, - 04:30 PM My peeps also tell me that the other challenges are going ahead. Allyson was first, not because she had the best case, but because she had the most money to do it. Time will tell. FACTS ONLY 01-22-08, - 04:32 PM better i ready them than you...lol :bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy::bouncy: :shaky: at ready Truthseeker 01-22-08, - 05:53 PM She won the challenge by having some of the cast ballot nullified/thrown out (110). Her assertion was wrong in that she was not the rightful elected representative of Pinewood Gardens. H-Well 01-22-08, - 06:10 PM I juss wan' know how da HELL dey get a court date so fast and all dem people been awaitin trial for years..... all o' dem fulla spit..... canesfins 01-22-08, - 06:34 PM My peeps also tell me that the other challenges are going ahead. Allyson was first, not because she had the best case, but because she had the most money to do it. Time will tell. This is not the case - her lawyers worked for free. This was a return favor from Brave. |