The issue is Obama and not Bush or Clinton. Obama!
What Bill Clinton did is irrelevant. Hillary Clinton is the candidate. What Bush did prior to being vetted by the American electorate and then appointed and elected to office for a second time is irrelevant!
OBama is the issue! Whether the American people will elect a person who is inexperience in international Affairs, national security, lacking in gravitas and the political base so critical and necessaryfor governance and who carrys trememdous anti social baggage and behviour as in Obamas admitted pot and cocaine usage to the Office of President? :hammer:I would not even mention his mysterious association with "mafiaso like" characters as currently incarcerated slum Landlond Rezko in Chicago.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-rezko30jan30,1,7947425.story
:hammer:Anyhow, I have more to say on this issue .. when I have time..If the American people could elect Bush, you don't think they could give Mr Obama a chance? That dummie just learn how to speak. He's the worst president we ever had. The American people would elect Obama, the only reason i think he would'nt make it is because he's black.

The issue is Obama and not Bush or Clinton. Obama!
What Bill Clinton did is irrelevant. Hillary Clinton is the candidate. What Bush did prior to being vetted by the American electorate and then appointed and elected to office for a second time is irrelevant!
OBama is the issue! Whether the American people will elect a person who is inexperience in international Affairs, national security, lacking in gravitas and the political base so critical and necessaryfor governance and who carrys trememdous anti social baggage and behviour as in Obamas admitted pot and cocaine usage to the Office of President? :hammer:I would not even mention his mysterious association with "mafiaso like" characters as currently incarcerated slum Landlond Rezko in Chicago.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-rezko30jan30,1,7947425.story
:hammer:Anyhow, I have more to say on this issue .. when I have time..

The issue is Clinton, making racist and unfounded remarks. She made Obama black, tearing apart the party in the process. She has sunk to a new low.

Also, her leadership has been called into question, with these racist attacks, while using Bill Clinton, to campaign for her and her not campaigning for herself.

She mentioned Rezko, after Obama mentioned that her and Edwards, share the same drug company lobbyist.

Rezko, was a client in the firm wheren Obama, was an intern. He was re-arrested, after he had already been indcited a month ago- political tampering by Clinton, to bring the story back to the top of the news.

However, while Obama happened to work for the law firm that Rezko used. Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, were knee deep in the Whitewater scandal. Bill got Hillary the job with the law firm who was responsible for Whitewater. She has no voice on this matter.

Fa goodness sake!!!!

George Bush was a full on cocaine addict and alcholic WELL into his thirties.

He saw that he was detroying himself and would end up dead in the ditch on a Texas back road not there for his twin babies abd wife, so he changed his ways.

I believe him.

Why not give Obama (who experimented with drugs as a teen and in college) the same?

Edwards, GONE!

Guliani, GONE!


hehehehe......

Edwards, GONE!
Guliani, GONE!
hehehehe......

YAY!

George Bush was a full on cocaine addict and alcholic WELL into his thirties.

Cocaine? So Obama was a crack head too?

I have this feeling that most here are simply supporting Obama because he shares the same skin color as them.

Cocaine? So Obama was a crack head too?

I have this feeling that most here are simply supporting Obama because he shares the same skin color as them.

Could it be the same thing for you supporting Bush, because he is of the same skin colour as you?

Bush was a crack head and we know this. Clinton smoked dope. LOL.....

Could it be the same thing for you supporting Bush, because he is of the same skin colour as you?
Bush was a crack head and we know this. Clinton smoked dope. LOL.....
You know bush was a crack head? Where is the proof?
No, SpamStopper don't see color first like some people.

But seriously, be real, be upfront, tell us if you support him cause he black and not white, it would be okay yah know.

Whoever wins deserves the win and the presidency. They fought for it. Now the question is will they be better than the one before them.

Could it be the same thing for you supporting Bush, because he is of the same skin colour as you?
Bush was a crack head and we know this. Clinton smoked dope. LOL.....

Bush was a crackhead? I knew he was a drunk,but I didn't know that.:confused:

You know bush was a crack head? Where is the proof?
No, I dont see color first like some people.
He admitted it- in not so many words.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_substance_abuse_controversy

He admitted it- in not so many words.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_substance_abuse_controversy


Firstly, Anybody can edit a Wiki Article.
Secondly:


"In a biography of Bush, Fortunate Son (ISBN 1-887128-84-0), James Hatfield investigated claims that Bush had been arrested for cocaine possession and that he had the record expunged; Hatfield said he found corroboration from three people close to the Bush family. Bush called Hatfield's book "totally ridiculous" but declined to discuss whether he had used drugs before 1974.[12] Critics have pointed out the sources for the book are unnamed and the facts uncorroborated. Four days after its publication, the book's publisher, St. Martin's Press, discovered that Hatfield had been previously convicted of attempted murder and spent five years in jail. When faced with the allegations Hatfield initially denied them but later admitted they were true. St. Martin's recalled the book and mothballed others. Hatfield pointed out that, before the Bush campaign brought pressure to bear, St. Martin's had stated that the book had been "carefully fact-checked and scrutinized by lawyers".[14] The book was later republished by another publisher shortly before Hatfield died of a drug overdose in an act of suicide."

He admitted it- in not so many words.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_substance_abuse_controversy

I have heard rumours of his cocaine use in his younger days,but not the crack thing. I do know for a fact that he never was allowed a solo flight while in the Air National Guard. It seems one of my Brother in Laws "a retired Lt.Col." served with him during training and told me Bush was incapable of it.:footmouth

Here is what I found:

A new book by Texas author J.H. Hatfield claims that George W. Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972, but had his record expunged with help from his family's political connections. In an afterword to his book "Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President" (St. Martin's), Hatfield says he took a second look at the Bush cocaine allegations after a story in Salon reporting allegations that Bush did community service for the crime at the Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center in Houston's Third Ward.

The center's executive director, Madgelean Bush (no relation to George W. Bush), had told Salon News and others that Bush did not do community service there, and the Bush campaign likewise denied the allegation. But the Texas governor had admitted to working at Houston's Project P.U.L.L. in 1972, and Hatfield says he began to wonder if that was actually the community service sentence. Hatfield says he confirmed those suspicions with three sources close to the Bush family he had cultivated while writing his biography, which publishes Wednesday.

Bush's campaign denied Hatfield's allegation Monday.

Hatfield also says that when he asked Scott McClellan to comment on the allegation of a former Yale classmate of Bush's that the presidential hopeful was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972 and had his record expunged in exchange for community service at Project P.U.L.L., the Bush campaign spokesman said, sotto voce, "Oh, ****," followed by, "No comment."