Google
 

View Full Version : The Evnvchvs


Pages : [1] 2

parietal_03
11-24-04, - 03:45 AM
http://bahamasissues.com/showthread.php?t=746&page=10&pp=15

How could you explain something that doesn't exist? When Jesus spoke about Eunuchs He was speaking about Eunuchs and noting more. If Transgender was a real condition and Jesus wanted to explain it, all He would have done was say that there are some people born half man, half woman. Simple! Now who wouldn't understand that ain't trying to or don't mean to no matter what time they living in.

Depends on what you mean by "exist." Explain a spirit. They exist. Explain their existence in simple terms. Explain transparency without looking it up in a dictionary.

I agree Christ "was speaking about eunuchs and nothing more." But Christ also knew that whatever He said, that there were bound to be some people who would read more into it or less into it than he intended. So He used a concept of the times, something the people He spoke to understood, The Eunuchus.
So in order to understand what was being said we should first and foremost know who and what role the Eunuch occupied circa Yeshua Bar Yoseph.
Now, what happens to a boy's/man's body if you cut off his penis and/or testicles? How does his body react hormonally and what are the resulting sequences as a result of homeostasis and hormonal imbalance? Research the word "castrati"
The castrati are the order of eunuch which the modern world is more familiar with.

Matthew 19:12 cites Yeshua Bar Yoseph as listing all the different types of eunuch.
"12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."

Eunuchus
1387, from Gk. eunoukhos "castrated man," originally "guard of the bedchamber or harem," from euno-, comb. form of eune "bed" + -okhos, from stem of ekhein "to have, hold." The Gk. and L. forms of the word were used to transl. Heb. saris, which sometimes meant merely "palace official," in Septuagint and Vulgate, probably without an intended comment on the qualities of bureaucrats.
"Eunuches is he þat is i-gilded, and suche were somtyme i-made wardeynes of ladyes in Egipt." [Travisa, 1387]

Also guess what most if all Greco-Roman royal cup-bearers were or resembled?

http://www.well.com/user/aquarius/terentius-eunuchus.htm

A lot can be learned and understood from the play, "Evnvchvs" because of what it tell us about the social status and role of eunuchs in third century BCE Roman and Greek society. We learn that eunuch slaves are an extreme luxury item, usually owned only by royalty, although eunuchs themselves have very low social status. Eunuchs could be quite effeminate.
("Quite effeminate" males = ANDROGYNY.)
They were given free access to women's private space, because, though friendly toward women, they were thought to be impotent with them and trustworthy as their guardians.
(CONJECTURE NOT FACT: They were thought to be impotent with women and so they went on to be thought of as impotent with men - a belief that pervades today in certain circles I.e. "Gay" men are always weak, 'limp-wristed' and anti-masculine.)
Therefore, to impersonate a eunuch was a great crime.
It was easy enough to impersonate a eunuch, though, by having the right kind of look and being introduced as a eunuch. (Well imagine that, some people impersonated eunuchs - This calls into question all those who weren't born eunuchs, weren't made eunuchs by other men, or those who in verity have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom)

When a eunuch proved untrustworthy by having sex with a woman, (imagine that as well, some eunuchs have sex with women) he was reclassified as a "male" [vir]. Otherwise a eunuch is never referred to as a male, but rather only as a non-gender-specific "human being" [homo].

(And if you re-read that last sentence you should, if you're sharp, understand where the confusion sets in about what a eunuch is and what a eunuch was thought of as:'men who were denied their masculinity socially to be deemed non-gender specific', but also you may grasp why the term "homosexual" is a term used, not only ignorantly but also out of context. "Male" is translated as "vir" so the correct term for a male who enjoys congress with other males is "virsexual/virosexual" and not the "non-gender-specific" homosexual).
Also please notice, that in Matt 19:12 Yeshua never says, "he" or "she" in reference to eunuchs but to the audience. So Yeshua is re-affirming the non-gender-specifications of the eunuch. That is what a eunuch is, a non-gender specific human being.


Notice also from Thraso's reaction to Chaerea in the guise of a eunuch (from the play Evnvchvs) that, although usually less enticing than a boy, a eunuch was considered a possible sex object for a man, especially after the man had been drinking. (And here we see that eunuchs also had sex with males)

We cannot say men are born castrated (or with their penises cut off) anymore than we can say women are just men born with their penises missing. Some eunuchs are born with or acquire more male qualities than female and some are born with or acquire more female qualities than male.
But if you notice, in Matt 19:12 Yeshua never says, "he" or "she." This is indication of another one of those social viruses picked up by people today. Eunuchs are NON-GENDER-SPECIFIC.

When a child is born either a penis is there, a penis is not there or a female's organ (or organs bearing semblances to both thereof) are present.
If you're born and the latter be your case and/or you bear some semblance to both sexes, this makes you an androgene/hermaphrodite/eunuch. You cannot be born a castrati but, indeed you can be born a eunuch and not all eunuchs are automatically "gay" or male or female for that matter.

Those who enjoy saying that "eunuch" does not in anyway mean androgynous, are incorrect and those that spurn androgenes because they are both male and female (not one or the other) and in some cases have both male and female desires (and not one or the other) are in my opinion based on these findings quite ignorant of the subject matter.

Vicky
11-24-04, - 05:01 PM
http://bahamasissues.com/showthread.php?t=746&page=10&pp=15



Depends on what you mean by "exist." Explain a spirit. They exist. Explain their existence in simple terms. Explain transparency without looking it up in a dictionary.

I agree Christ "was speaking about eunuchs and nothing more." But Christ also knew that whatever He said, that there were bound to be some people who would read more into it or less into it than he intended. So He used a concept of the times, something the people He spoke to understood, The Eunuchus.
So in order to understand what was being said we should first and foremost know who and what role the Eunuch occupied circa Yeshua Bar Yoseph.
Now, what happens to a boy's/man's body if you cut off his penis and testicles? just a quick correction the penis does not have to be removed and as I understand it, It was not because of the large blood vessels the person would more than likely bleed to death. It was the testicles that were removed. example when they castrate a dog it still has its penis. It just cuts the ability to produce sperm and testosterone. There is also Biblical evidence that eunuch could reproduce. As in the story of Daniel and the prince of the eunuchs. It does not say a prince of a king or queen but of eunuchsHow does his body react hormonally and what are the resulting sequences as a result of homeostasis and hormonal imbalance? Research the word "castrati"
The castrati are the order of eunuch which the modern world is more familiar with.

Matthew 19:12 cites Yeshua Bar Yoseph as listing all the different types of eunuch.
"12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."

Eunuchus
1387, from Gk. eunoukhos "castrated man," originally "guard of the bedchamber or harem," from euno-, comb. form of eune "bed" + -okhos, from stem of ekhein "to have, hold." The Gk. and L. forms of the word were used to transl. Heb. saris, which sometimes meant merely "palace official," in Septuagint and Vulgate, probably without an intended comment on the qualities of bureaucrats.
"Eunuches is he þat is i-gilded, and suche were somtyme i-made wardeynes of ladyes in Egipt." [Travisa, 1387]

Also guess what most if all Greco-Roman royal cup-bearers were or resembled?

http://www.well.com/user/aquarius/terentius-eunuchus.htm

A lot can be learned and understood from the play, "Evnvchvs" because of what it tell us about the social status and role of eunuchs in third century BCE Roman and Greek society. We learn that eunuch slaves are an extreme luxury item, usually owned only by royalty, although eunuchs themselves have very low social status. Eunuchs could be quite effeminate.
("Quite effeminate" males = ANDROGYNY.)
They were given free access to women's private space, because, though friendly toward women, they were thought to be impotent with them and trustworthy as their guardians.
(CONJECTURE NOT FACT: They were thought to be impotent with women and so they went on to be thought of as impotent with men - a belief that pervades today in certain circles I.e. "Gay" men are always weak, 'limp-wristed' and anti-masculine.)
Therefore, to impersonate a eunuch was a great crime.
It was easy enough to impersonate a eunuch, though, by having the right kind of look and being introduced as a eunuch. (Well imagine that, some people impersonated eunuchs - This calls into question all those who weren't born eunuchs, weren't made eunuchs by other men, or those who in verity have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom)

When a eunuch proved untrustworthy by having sex with a woman, (imagine that as well, some eunuchs have sex with women) he was reclassified as a "male" [vir]. Otherwise a eunuch is never referred to as a male, but rather only as a non-gender-specific "human being" [homo].

(And if you re-read that last sentence you should, if you're sharp, understand where the confusion sets in about what a eunuch is and what a eunuch was thought of as:'men who were denied their masculinity socially to be deemed non-gender specific', but also you may grasp why the term "homosexual" is a term used, not only ignorantly but also out of context. "Male" is translated as "vir" so the correct term for a male who enjoys congress with other males is "virsexual/virosexual" and not the "non-gender-specific" homosexual).
Also please notice, that in Matt 19:12 Yeshua never says, "he" or "she" in reference to eunuchs but to the audience. So Yeshua is re-affirming the non-gender-specifications of the eunuch. That is what a eunuch is, a non-gender specific human being.


Notice also from Thraso's reaction to Chaerea in the guise of a eunuch (from the play Evnvchvs) that, although usually less enticing than a boy, a eunuch was considered a possible sex object for a man, especially after the man had been drinking. (And here we see that eunuchs also had sex with males)

We cannot say men are born castrated (or with their penises cut off) anymore than we can say women are just men born with their penises missing. Some eunuchs are born with or acquire more male qualities than female and some are born with or acquire more female qualities than male.
But if you notice, in Matt 19:12 Yeshua never says, "he" or "she." This is indication of another one of those social viruses picked up by people today. Eunuchs are NON-GENDER-SPECIFIC.

When a child is born either a penis is there, a penis is not there or a female's organ (or organs bearing semblances to both thereof) are present.
If you're born and the latter be your case and/or you bear some semblance to both sexes, this makes you an androgene/hermaphrodite/eunuch. You cannot be born a castrati but, indeed you can be born a eunuch and not all eunuchs are automatically "gay" or male or female for that matter.

What most people don't know is the penis and clitoris come from the same fetal material between the legs. There is also hormone effect in the womb that effect the brain. So The child can have a eunuch brain but a normal looking sex organ

Those who enjoy saying that "eunuch" does not in anyway mean androgynous, are incorrect and those that spurn androgenes because they are both male and female (not one or the other) and in some cases have both male and female desires (and not one or the other) are in my opinion based on these findings quite ignorant of the subject matter.

parietal_03
11-24-04, - 06:08 PM
just a quick correction the penis does not have to be removed and as I understand it, It was not because of the large blood vessels the person would more than likely bleed to death. It was the testicles that were removed. example when they castrate a dog it still has its penis. It just cuts the ability to produce sperm and testosterone.

Hmm, perhaps I should've said sexual organs instead of just penis...for most people the glans (shaft) is what comes to mind when you say "penis."

bsmbahamas
11-26-04, - 10:11 AM
There is also Biblical evidence that eunuch could reproduce. As in the story of Daniel and the prince of the eunuchs. It does not say a prince of a king or queen but of eunuchs


does the bible say if the eunuch was castrated before having the child?
or does it say that he had both organs and may have used one of them to produce a child?

besides if they could reproduce, that does not support your case for same sex marriages.

Vicky
11-26-04, - 05:13 PM
does the bible say if the eunuch was castrated before having the child?Do you think Christ had some idea of what the future held? I do. I also understand Christ had to speak in a way the people of his time could understand.
For Christ to describe all the forms of a eunuch he would have had a book 4 times the size of the Bible or more. Christ could not use the name hermaphrodite because that was the name of a Greek god. Even hermaphrodite can't describe all the different forms of ambiguous sex or the different combinations of chromosomes. Just because you can’t see the difference on the outside does not mean they are not different inside. Can you look at some one and tell if they are left or right handed???? NO. Can people be born with perfectly good eyes and still be blind??? YES. Are they less human.
Now you can try to deny that there are humans that don’t fit the male female role all you like. Christ taught it and Science confirms it.
Are the humans that don’t fit the male female role any less human?
Are they any less entitled to equal rights?
Are they any less entitled to life love and happiness?
Are they any less entitled to be in a legal union with the person they love??

or does it say that he had both organs and may have used one of them to produce a child?

besides if they could reproduce, that does not support your case for same sex marriages.

Please answer these.
The Bible refers to the 4 corners of the earth.
Does a globe have corners? (If I may be so bold I will answer for you) NO.

If a globe has no corners is the earth flat or square or is there misinterpretation and the earth is in fact a globe???

In the 15th century you would be charged and arrested by the church and sometimes put to death as a heretic for saying the earth was round. Yes or No??
If you were left handed you we tortured and burned alive for being a worker of the devil. Why???? I will tell you misinterpretation ignorance and fear. If you have another answer please post it.
Are you trying to convince me that all those times Christians were mistaken and now they may not be?
Are you so sure of the Bible and its/your interpretation that you are not wrong and the world is indeed flat????

parietal_03
11-26-04, - 11:09 PM
Are you trying to convince me that all those times Christians were mistaken and now they may not be?
:screw:
Waits for someone to respond.

bsmbahamas
11-29-04, - 03:11 PM
Are the humans that don’t fit the male female role any less human?
no

Are they any less entitled to equal rights?
no

Are they any less entitled to life love and happiness?
no

Are they any less entitled to be in a legal union with the person they love??
no, but not married.

Please answer these.
The Bible refers to the 4 corners of the earth.
Does a globe have corners? (If I may be so bold I will answer for you) NO.

If a globe has no corners is the earth flat or square or is there misinterpretation and the earth is in fact a globe???

In the 15th century you would be charged and arrested by the church and sometimes put to death as a heretic for saying the earth was round. Yes or No??
If you were left handed you we tortured and burned alive for being a worker of the devil. Why???? I will tell you misinterpretation ignorance and fear. If you have another answer please post it.
Are you trying to convince me that all those times Christians were mistaken and now they may not be?
Are you so sure of the Bible and its/your interpretation that you are not wrong and the world is indeed flat????


what does the world being flat have to do with eunuchs?

I have never encountered a bible teaching that encouraged left handed people to be put to death or to be put to death for beleiving the world was round.

How was the bible used to support the death penalty and torture for those christians of the past?

Rizzo
11-29-04, - 03:33 PM
good rebuttal....:)

Alien
11-30-04, - 09:18 PM
vickys rebuttal for everything is saying the world is flat!!
;)

Vicky
12-01-04, - 02:58 PM
what does the world being flat have to do with eunuchs?
interpretation?
I have never encountered a bible teaching that encouraged left handed people to be put to death or to be put to death for beleiving the world was round.
Just as you are blind/mislead now you would have been blind/mislead then.
How was the bible used to support the death penalty and torture for those christians of the past?

Again just for you.

http://www.macha.free-online.co.uk/7day-extracts/malleus-malificorum.html

http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/

http://www.illusions.com/burning/burnwitc.htm
http://www.illusions.com/burning/burnwit1.htm
just a few of the names of people kill in the name of Christ.
http://www.illusions.com/burning/burnwit2.htm
just a few thousand of the un-named ones killed in the name of Christ.
40,000 executed between 1600-1680 in Great Britain

read it and weep for Christian injustice.

Vicky
12-01-04, - 03:04 PM
vickys rebuttal for everything is saying the world is flat!!
;)

Uh sorry that is my rebuttal for those that look away from scientific fact.
Fact people thought the world was flat and the Christian church stood by it for years. Then there was proof that the world was indeed round.
What did the Christians do then they denied it for as long as they could lie to the people. WHY.
Because they did not want to admit they were wrong.

Rizzo
12-01-04, - 03:10 PM
"Note that this site does not judge nor condemn Christianity, or any other Faith, for the past misguided actions of a minority of its members. The idea of "permanent collective guilt" is stupid. We present this list as historical data ...... and as an object lesson in the ultimate results of intolerance, superstition and hate-mongering."

That came from one of the links you listed Vicky.....you should heed those words...because it seems you dislike Christians.....are there other religions that you dislike because they don't support homosexuality? Because Christianity is not the only one you know......

(P.S. .......when was the last time Christians burned witches? killed someone because of their practices? killed someone because of their preferences? Answer the questions straight-forward, without any Christie-shuffling....) :dancer:

Alien
12-01-04, - 10:22 PM
Uh sorry that is my rebuttal for those that look away from scientific fact.
Fact people thought the world was flat and the Christian church stood by it for years. Then there was proof that the world was indeed round.
What did the Christians do then they denied it for as long as they could lie to the people. WHY.
Because they did not want to admit they were wrong.


hhhmmmmmmmmmm
:gi:

parietal_03
12-02-04, - 01:12 AM
because it seems you dislike Christians.....are there other religions that you dislike because they don't support homosexuality? Because Christianity is not the only one you know......
No, (from my observation) Vicki does not like stupid, stiff-necked people that cannot admit when they are wrong. Especially when they like to play sacred and profane games with other people's lives and lifestyles when their own ain't in order. It just so happens that the majority of the people that fit said descriptive on this site, happen to be calling themselves "Christian." So at first, maybe second and possibly third glances it would seem Vicki doesn't like Christians. This is not so.

In the words of Gandhi, "Christianity is a wonderful religion, people should try it sometime."

Rizzo
12-02-04, - 08:41 AM
I've read some posts from people who never said they were Christians, but appear to be Christians to Vicky, and they were heavily addressed. Which led me to say what I said. And from various posts you can see Vicky attacking the bible, and many other Christian related topics....not once have I ever heard Vicky talk about Rastafarianism or Islam, and they are heavily against homosexuality. And as said before...there are some people who don't follow any religion and are still against homosexuality. This is what I have observed myself in these forums.
And how does Vicky know that someone is wrong? Because she believes in something and the other person doesn't? Does that make them wrong? No it doesn't, they have a disagreement due to their own beliefs...but who can actually prove the other is wrong without something that overwhelmingly supports their claim? This is why I said in another post that something like this issue will be going on for a long time, because both sides on sexuality cannot just let each other be.....therefore I probably won't get involved in such topics anymore, because I made my points and didn't get any strong rebuttals so I am content with the outcome. I'll focus on more social/political/educational issues that plague the society, other than sexual/religious preference.

Cool?.....cool... :cool: