FACTS ONLY
02-11-08, - 08:46 PM
About 15 to 20 women out there with placards and voicing their complaints and the culprit sitting up big as Billy saying sheen think she did anything wrong!!:jawdroop:
The man in charge looked lost and say he ga have a meeting with the women. The demonstrators say they een wan meet with him cos they are sick and tired of their complaints falling on deaf ears.
Its time to throw General Orders out with the deadheads!!
One demonstrator was employed there for 47 years. Surely she is not going to demonstrate if she felt her concerns wouldv'e been heard.
TruBunny
02-11-08, - 08:50 PM
Was it NIB that set this trend in motion of protesting in the public of bad supervisors/Managers?
Dey aint playin
diarra
02-11-08, - 08:50 PM
not for nothing the lady that all of the ruckus is about did come across rather rude in the brief interview she did.
General Orders....... that ain't as good as the paper they wasted printing that on..
FACTS ONLY
02-11-08, - 08:55 PM
not for nothing the lady that all of the ruckus is about did come across rather rude in the brief interview she did.
General Orders....... that ain't as good as the paper they wasted printing that on..
yeah you see that hey? she sitting up there bout I OONLY DOIN MY JOB!! While Rome outside burning she inside fiddli.:hot: where some a dem does go fa them big balls dey gat?
bahamiangoddess
02-11-08, - 09:20 PM
Despite how we feel about General Orders, if the supervisor acted within the ambits of the law, there is nothing they can do. They may even get a salary cut for being absent without permission, I see the Union was visibly absent.
This may be a new supervisor who changing some things they do not like.
Most people who have been on the job for 47 years are usually set in their ways and do not welcome change and people telling them what to do.
FACTS ONLY
02-11-08, - 09:24 PM
Despite how we feel about General Orders, if the supervisor acted within the ambits of the law, there is nothing they can do. They may even get a salary cut for being absent without permission, I see the Union was visibly absent.
This may be a new supervisor who changing some things they do not like.
Most people who have been on the job for 47 years are usually set in their ways and do not welcome change and people telling them what to do.
would it be enough to forced them to want to demonstrate?
lynette
02-12-08, - 10:56 AM
Well according to one of the protesters she was carrying some correspondence from one office to the next and had a slip and fall accident. This woman they protesting said that the fall happened in a RESTRICTED area where the staff member should not have been thus the victim got no National Insurance is still out of work and is on 7/8 ths pay.....What the hell is that about?
fasttract
02-12-08, - 01:19 PM
About 15 to 20 women out there with placards and voicing their complaints and the culprit sitting up big as Billy saying sheen think she did anything wrong!!:jawdroop:
The man in charge looked lost and say he ga have a meeting with the women. The demonstrators say they een wan meet with him cos they are sick and tired of their complaints falling on deaf ears.
Its time to throw General Orders out with the deadheads!!
One demonstrator was employed there for 47 years. Surely she is not going to demonstrate if she felt her concerns wouldv'e been heard.
JUST WAIT UNTELL IT TIME FOR INCREASE AND PROMOTION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE.WHAT ELSE IS NEW.