Google
 

View Full Version : Look at what I found


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Vicky
12-05-04, - 09:46 AM
I fear 1 day this could happen to me as well because many of you will not stand up for equality no matter how different.


http://www.gender.org/remember/index.html#
4th colum 2nd down
Unknown person
wearing wig

read the poem
(I don't wear a wig)

Fith name on the right look at the cause of death
Giuseppe Mandanici

CG
12-05-04, - 01:04 PM
Shocking!

I am reminded of a quotation by Mark Twain. I dont know why it came to mind, but it did:

"Man is a Religious Animal. He is the only Religious Animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion—several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat if his theology isn't straight."

bsmbahamas
12-06-04, - 01:52 PM
I can't view that site from work 'cause it is blocked.

I'll check it out later.

I certainly hope the death was not by a christian, as we are not allowed to kill other human beings.

And like I said before Vicky, equality is afforded to all under the law of the land - people even christians can be persuaded by external forces, often their own friends, relatives, or even the media to do wrong.

The thing is if you allow your freewill to run wild and follow and harbour bad thoughts they tend to grow and get more real in your mind, and if you don't correct your thinking you will be led astray.

Not saying that I am perfect, nobody is. But it is wrong to take the life of another person especially when they have not killed someone first.

In the old days, i.e. under Moses's Law murderers were put to death as well, but we are not suppose to kill today - and yes there are christians that support the death penalty, but there are also christians that don't support it.

Some christians support the death penalty for homosexuals as well, but adultery was also punishable by death under Moses's law - but how many adulterer are given death penalties today in the modern world?

In reality no one should receive the death penalty under new testament christian standards, but the law makes the rules not the christians, we are all subject to the law regardless of religion, and we are all protected under the law of the state as well.

The law cannot prevent crime until it has been committed, but you are still protected by the law in the sense that the law will punish the offender not that it can prevent an offense from occurring.

Vicky
12-06-04, - 03:12 PM
I can't view that site from work 'cause it is blocked.

I'll check it out later.

I certainly hope the death was not by a christian, as we are not allowed to kill other human beings.

And like I said before Vicky, equality is afforded to all under the law of the land - Sorry this is not so I know people that can't marry or what ever you want to call it. So they are not equal under the law. people even christians can be persuaded by external forces, often their own friends, relatives, or even the media to do wrong.

The thing is if you allow your freewill Nothing wrong with freewill as long as you arnt hurting anyone. to run wild and follow and harbour bad thoughts they tend to grow and get more real in your mind, and if you don't correct your thinking you will be led astray.

Not saying that I am perfect, nobody is. But it is wrong to take the life of another person especially when they have not killed someone first.

In the old days, i.e. under Moses's Law murderers were put to death as well, but we are not suppose to kill today - and yes there are christians that support the death penalty, but there are also christians that don't support it.

Some christians support the death penalty for homosexuals as well, but adultery was also punishable by death under Moses's law - but how many adulterer are given death penalties today in the modern world?

In reality no one should receive the death penalty under new testament christian standards, but the law makes the rules not the christians, we are all subject to the law regardless of religion, and we are all protected under the law of the state as well.

The law cannot prevent crime until it has been committed, but you are still protected by the law in the sense that the law will punish the offender not that it can prevent an offense from occurring.

Vicky
12-07-04, - 01:22 AM
http://www.carlaantonelli.com/trans_famosas.htm

Check out the bottom of the page
A transexual mixing it up with royalty

Vicky
01-17-05, - 08:05 PM
They will stup to anything.


http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0002/20050117/0723527570.htm

Pentagon Spurned Plan to Initiate Enemy Homosexuality

By Jim Wolf
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military rejected a 1994 proposal to develop an "aphrodisiac" to spur homosexual activity among enemy troops but is hard at work on other less-than-lethal weapons, defense officials said Sunday.

The idea of fostering homosexuality among the enemy figured in a declassified six-year, $7.5 million request from a laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio for funding of non-lethal chemical weapon research.

The proposal, disclosed in response to a Freedom of Information request, called for developing chemicals affecting human behavior "so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely affected."

"One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior," said the document, obtained by the Sunshine Project. The watchdog group posted the partly blacked-out, three-page document on its Web site.

Lt. Col. Barry Venable of the Army, a Defense Department spokesman, said: "This suggestion arose essentially from a brainstorming session, and it was rejected out of hand."

The Air Force Research Laboratory also suggested using chemicals that could be sprayed on enemy positions to attract stinging and biting bugs, rodents and larger animals.

Another idea involved creating "severe and lasting halitosis" to help sniff out fighters trying to blend with civilians.

The U.S. military remains committed to developing less-than-lethal weapons that pass stringent legal reviews and are consistent with international treaties, said Captain Dan McSweeny of the Marine Corps, a spokesman for the Pentagon unit spearheading their introduction.

"We feel it's very important to offer our deployed service members and their commanders a greater range of options in dealing with increasingly complex operational environments," said McSweeny, of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.


01/17/05 07:22

© Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd

k.o.o.l.b.o.n.z.e
01-17-05, - 08:50 PM
saw this on canibus-central (the rapper, not the fiborous plant ;)) The U.S. cracks me up with their "non-lethal" line of theoretical weaponry.

Rory
01-17-05, - 08:56 PM
if the 'enemy' gets laid more there would be less resistance !! :)

bsmbahamas
01-18-05, - 11:30 AM
if the 'enemy' gets laid more there would be less resistance !! :)


lol

Vicky
01-26-05, - 06:48 AM
Upon referencing the first chapters of Genesis, we find in the account of creation that "In the image of Yahweh created He them (mankind), male and female created He them", whereby indicating that the "image of Yahweh" has both masculine and feminine attributes or qualities. Now for clarity, Yahweh is a Spirit, and because spirits do not have gender, Yahweh is in fact, neither male nor female. Therefore when we speak of Yahweh in these terms, it is merely figurative (remez or allegorical), so that we can better understand Yahweh from our human perspective.

http://www.joyintheworld.info/articles/the_ruach_hakodesh_him_or_her.html

bsmbahamas
01-26-05, - 12:34 PM
Upon referencing the first chapters of Genesis, we find in the account of creation that "In the image of Yahweh created He them (mankind), male and female created He them", whereby indicating that the "image of Yahweh" has both masculine and feminine attributes or qualities. Now for clarity, Yahweh is a Spirit, and because spirits do not have gender, Yahweh is in fact, neither male nor female. Therefore when we speak of Yahweh in these terms, it is merely figurative (remez or allegorical), so that we can better understand Yahweh from our human perspective.

http://www.joyintheworld.info/articles/the_ruach_hakodesh_him_or_her.html


so why is he never referred to as mother then?

even Jesus taught us to pray to our Father.

2 Peter 1:17
For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

Stop trying to change our book.

bsmbahamas
01-26-05, - 12:37 PM
Genesis 27:1

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

nope, not she, *created he*.
nope, not her, *his own image*.

Also, everytime Jesus prayed or cried out to god, he always said father, not mother.

Vicky
01-26-05, - 10:04 PM
Genesis 27:1

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

nope, not she, *created he*.
nope, not her, *his own image*.

Also, everytime Jesus prayed or cried out to god, he always said father, not mother.

Think you need to go to the page/site and read it all.

bsmbahamas
01-27-05, - 05:43 PM
Think you need to go to the page/site and read it all.


ditto, and take of your pro homosexuality glasses while you do so.

Vicky
01-29-05, - 07:56 AM
ditto, and take of your pro homosexuality glasses while you do so.

I am just pointing out God/ The Creator has no sex or gender and yet God/ The Creator has both.