Hey let me ask you something. Suppose it was your daughter, would you want it to be brought out before the nation.
If it was your son, and you were the minister, how does that become the nations business. Would this even be a story if it were not for the fact that a minister's child is involved.
Now maybe high school has changed a bit since I was there but I remember vividly numerous sex scandals at SJC when I was there.
After all high school is where the teens are, we can all remember where our minds where when we where in high school.
In fact Bradley's mind is still there thats why he get in trouble with that woman.

Don't get what I said confused with what you think I am trying to say! Weeks before, there were these sex acts recorded by phone by school teens, starring school teens. When the incident came to light, did the Minister pass up the opportunity to reassure the public that the matter would be investigated by the RBPF??? He found words to say without disclosing the name of the students involved, the high schools they were from, and what would be the end result of the investigations!

Yes there are numerous sexual encounters, that happen in our schools all the time that aren't brought to our attention, but this incident was!!! Reguardless of the true motive behind it, I would expect for him to say something anywayz. One because he is the Minister of Education and even more so because there are claims that his family is involved. When it comes down to it, everyone is up in everyones business!!! Prove to me this is not true.

So if she was 'virginal' she would have more room to talk?!
What's your point? That she "trapped" this poor, innocent, young 17 year old? (Rhetorical)
To me, it's not that he's a male; it's that he is older than her and as a prefect, he is or was, entrusted with the responsibility of taking care of students who looked up to him. Instead, this girl was taking care of him. Seriously, he's lucky that he wasn't eighteen at the time, or Bradley would want his head on a political platter.

Okay it's obvious that some of you guys don't understand how I write or what is being said.

The reason behind me saying that:

I just learnt who are the parents of this young lady, and why I see the reason that both parties had remain tight lipped on the matter - was because the family of the young lady are very well known prominent PLP's! Get what I was saying now???? A popular FNM family and a PLP family involved in a situation as this!!! I don't know what you pulled out of what I had typed, but your reply tells me that I didn't convey myself clear enough for you to understand.

My point to the second is that if this young girl has been kicked out of another school before for the same thing, all before the age of 13 tells me that she is just down with expressing her sexuality. As far as I can see there innocence in regards to sex have been long gone. Just don't let her of the hook as if she was raped, her participation in this was one of a willing young lady!

are you serious about these questions??? if you are i would hope you put as much as passion into asking Tommy what are his plans for stopping people getting stab up on a public beach.


Those are NOT 'MY' questions!! The first post was copied and pasted from another site.

Exotic..the point of the post was to highlight the fact that both the minister of National Security and Carl knew about it and nothing is being done. Who gives two craps if it was his nephew or his uncle point is TWO ministers knew of it. Statutory rape regardless of how the police finds out should be investigated and its amazing how these papers wouldn't dare report it. Gimmie crime stoppers number they're saying it hasn't been reported last time I check our law books as long as they heard about it, a rumor etc they must investigate it. Amazing how these people above the law, had it happened to any member of the PLP, I guarantee you it would have been in the front page of the tribune. I wouldn't even bother to argue with some of the stupid comments that would be said or argued for this point, voluntary ignorance is criminal.



Actually Facts it is his nephew.. He and his wife did however raise him, but their birth children are not that old yet.. Just thought to inform u of that so the FACTS could stay straight..:cutie:

You just answered your own question right there.
The sex recordings, again = public; this was a private matter until people decided to interfere for political reasons and not for the welfare of the child/children involved.
Cause it's not his business. Shawn (his wife) should interefere in matters of national security and he shouldn't interfere with QC matters. If these incidents are as common as people believe, then RBPF should be stationed in schools around the clock.
What would have them say?


Boy we have some subjective eyes..see what they wish. WHat u mean it ain't his business..statutory rape falls under National Security. This subject has nothing to do with party at all, its amazing how everything regardless of the topic leads back to party. Hypocrites

What do you mean the sex recording were public, and this matter is a private until people interfered for political turmoil! So you don't call being caught performing oral sex in the back of one of our nations prominent schools, out in the public?????
Or is it that you went to say that the sex recordings were from merly public school students and this was a private school incident????? That's the biggest croc of double standard bull crap I have ever heard or think that you are suggesting. What the hell you mean not his (Bradley Roberts) business? So I guess his incident was your business, and the Leslie Miller stuff and all the others were better suited for public interest because of who they are?
Some of you guys are living in such hypocritical shells that it's impossible for you guys to use reason and objective thought!
QC is a private school, so it will be the call of the parents, school board, and the administative staff of the school to decide if they need to go to such lenghts.
Stop hiding behind party affiliation, and demand answers from everyone!!!!!!

Amen

I think this story is more about who the children peeple is than what happened between these off the chain kids...bradley roberts should keep his mouth shut...especially after all that was alleged about his person.

Those are NOT 'MY' questions!! The first post was copied and pasted from another site.

ok, well my response for the original writer den.
and you know it would also be helpful if you cite the source as well.

Boy we have some subjective eyes..see what they wish. WHat u mean it ain't his business..statutory rape falls under National Security. This subject has nothing to do with party at all, its amazing how everything regardless of the topic leads back to party. Hypocrites

statutory rape....this is not the case cause it was the girl on her knees doing all the action.

Am I da only one confused here? Didn't we discuss a similar topic last year,with a 17 yr old & a 14 yr old? And iffin memory serves I correct buddy was hauled before the courts. Or is there a different law for Exumians vs Nassauvians?

looks like it's a different law also for some of these other fellas (eg jitney drivers) who is be getting some of these 13 yrs pregnant, seems like we like to act blind in some cases but hang the others.

statutory rape....this is not the case cause it was the girl on her knees doing all the action.

regardless..she cannot consent..whether she was on her knees or her legs in the air. By the country's law he is guilty of statutory rape..but i guess that only applies to certain people.

I think this story is more about who the children peeple is than what happened between these off the chain kids...bradley roberts should keep his mouth shut...especially after all that was alleged about his person.

So let me get this straight...because Bradley was accused of rape and what not, he should not hold the government who is power accountable for their actions or lack thereof? Ya'll people really need to get educated and stop being taken for fools, you vote them in so you can hold them accountable and should be protesting for this wrongful action to hit the courts rather than saying who can't say what or who in the position.