So I see all the anti-war demonstrators dancing around the streets of major cities around the world, and then I read things like this. http://www.kdp.pp.se/chemical.html

Brings me to thinking about the Bahamas point of view on the war. Should we (not the Bahamas, but the UN/Western Superpowers) go in there are execute Saddam? Imprison him? Leave him alone?

Should we allow Israel to fall into the hands of Babylon again? I think not!

As I see all the anti-war demonstrators and US citizens that are volunteering to go to Iraq to act as human shields; I laugh. :D Its almost funny to see how people are so quick to jump to the aid of the devil in his time of crisis and forget who he really is which is “the devil”. :hot:

Why didn't these anti-war demonstrators act as human shields for the thousands of Kuwaitis who where bombed, murdered and raped by Iraq's army in 1991 for no reason whatsoever but jealousy. Or the poor Sheike Muslims in northern Iraq who were used as Ginnie pigs for Iraq's chemical weapons. :rolleyes:

This war is not just about oil, its about control. Saddam Hussein wants to control the middle east for one reason and one reason only. Israel! He figures that if he has control of all of the nations surrounding Israel (including Saudi Arabia) he can defeat it (which will never happen). Saddam Hussein was said to have sworn to bring the Israelites back to Babylon (Iraq) in chains. I also heard that he believes himself to be the reincarnation of King Nebukadnezar who had accomplished that goal of defeating Israel. Obviously Saddam is crazy. :uh:

So what if the united states takes Iraq's oil after the war? I would! Not only that; I would strip the gold from their palace walls, cease the bank accounts of all of their leaders including their families and take every weapon that they have back to my country to turn into scrap metal. That is how you make the defeated pay for the war and it is righteous to take the spoils.

I believe that this country knows what their role is when it comes to people like Saddam and we should make all the effort no matter how small it may seem to assist in the demolishing of these kinds of evil or it will end up on our own front door. Ether way; Saddam Hussein is a dead man. If he isn't killed by his own people or himself; the allied nations will kill him. Their isn't a jail cell in this world for him.

I think now is the time for a confrontation with iraq. If we in fact wait another few years Sadam will have far to many weapons of mass destruction and I think now is better because maybe he is still in the developing weapons of mass destruction stage.

http://www.francestinks.com/

Bahahahah...

Just HAD to post this. :D :D :D :D

http://www.protestwarrior.com/images/protest_gallery/us/index.htm

Found these shots of an anti anti war protest. Wish I could have been there helping the cause.:tup:

The war is something that simply was un avoidable.
Sadam needs to be stoped before he becomes unstoppable and any one who thinks otherwise is looking out for self interest.

Where are you warmongerers now????The silence is deafening.America is in another guerrilla war just like the Soviets in Afganistan.When you rush to destroy others in a so called "Holy war" this is the mess you make for yourself.

Noone is jumping on the side of evil.How stupid!The uninformed always thinks he knows exactly how the world works.America supports and fund these dictators of the world until they have no use for them.Then they destroy them along with thousands of innocent people.When you give dangerous,unstable leaders weapon of mass destruction,you are just as or more guilty than them.

This war Against Iraq was planned long before 11-9 attack.The Iraqi people should not have to suffer because of the hegemony,imperialistic and fascistic american designs.The human shield was to protect the Iraqis.

This war is not just about oil, its about control. Saddam Hussein wants to control the middle east for one reason and one reason only. Israel! He figures that if he has control of all of the nations surrounding Israel (including Saudi Arabia) he can defeat it (which will never happen). Saddam Hussein was said to have sworn to bring the Israelites back to Babylon (Iraq) in chains. I also heard that he believes himself to be the reincarnation of King Nebukadnezar who had accomplished that goal of defeating Israel. Obviously Saddam is crazy. Western propaganda.

Look who gone and raise the dead!
"Western propaganda" ay?
Ok, which neighbor you would have chosen to have before the war?

Iraq or America?

Rory,I was only replying to the dumb crap you posted ealier you :taped: moron!

You are pretty loud and "well spoken" for a security guard.

first i dont know you well enough for you to call me a moron without consequences.

2nd, im not a security guard.

3rd, i only ever post facts, not crap. some people with little minds may disagree, but then its a free country, thanks to the US OF A.

Rroy and Delroy


I know you two are hosting most of these threads but that does not make a difference.

You need to visit more serious forums so you can stop being so petty.
I realize that when the facts are against you both you team up and make silly sassy petty remarks.

The facts are revealed to you but its better to speak foolishness which seems to entertain you the most.

I participate in this silly forum, but my God this is exposed for the whole wide world and they see what Bahamians are like by reading your remarks. I will continue to participate in this forum but only for the good of the Bahamian people for as long as I wish only so that the world doesn’t get a dumb and petty impression of all Bahamians by the outcome of your actions and remarks.

So carry on with your petty and sassy pointless remarks.
I’ll be here and on your trail to back up the Bahamian people wherever I must.

Now you can run on or we can move on choose...

I realize that when the facts are against you both you team up and make silly sassy petty remarks.

Me and Rory a team? :sarcastic ***thinking***
This isn't Survivor my friend but this war is reality TV. All I am posting is my thoughts on this issue.

Here are my views on this War Iupdate:

America: Disorganized Government with too many bad apples in their Military.

Iraq: God left there a long time ago and only Him can change it (not George Bush).

Saddam Hussein: The best man for the job of running a country like Iraq. I say clean the man up, give him his old job back, tell him how sorry you were for killing his sons and oh; the prison scandal; just a little cabin fever. :)

George Bush: Good man! Just like his father; wants to do Gods' job but without authorization.

Don't worry it will all be over soon, June 30th right?

whatever...... :p

they should have killed him 12 years ago.

PS. this is a view of a US, Uk and Bahamas person. And I dont care who sees this, or whether they agree or not, thats the great thing about FREEDOM.

PSS. Why not list some of those intelligent forums so we can learn as much as you, I hate being a dumb bastid :dancer2:

WHATELSE??????:uh:

Your remarks get a D then a F and then a D again.

So you know my answer already right? That is DUMB, DUMB, DUMB, DUMB, but I understand that is the best that you can do, for you its not WHATEVER, for you it is "WHATELSE" :wipe:
Keep up you non-answers I so that I can SLAMMMmmmm you with your best mark of "D's", I know, I understand, this is best that you can do. :bored:

bUt WhAtElSe - that word is WHAT ELSE so dont get any more confussed than you are already:bigmouth:

I am out of here :walk:

Me and Rory a team? :sarcastic ***thinking***
This isn't Survivor my friend but this war is reality TV. All I am posting is my thoughts on this issue.

Here are my views on this War Iupdate:

America: Disorganized Government with too many bad apples in their Military.

Iraq: God left there a long time ago and only Him can change it (not George Bush).

Saddam Hussein: The best man for the job of running a country like Iraq. I say clean the man up, give him his old job back, tell him how sorry you were for killing his sons and oh; the prison scandal; just a little cabin fever. :)

George Bush: Good man! Just like his father; wants to do Gods' job but without authorization.

Don't worry it will all be over soon, June 30th right?


Perhaps I made a mistake, I am sorry. :confused:

Perhaps I made a mistake, I am sorry. :confused:

Apology accepted.
We are all mature people here and this just a discussion so let's discuss it like mature people. Let's leave out all the ray ray and name calling and learn from one another.

whatever...... :p

they should have killed him 12 years ago.

PS. this is a view of a US, Uk and Bahamas person. And I dont care who sees this, or whether they agree or not, thats the great thing about FREEDOM.

PSS. Why not list some of those intelligent forums so we can learn as much as you, I hate being a dumb bastid :dancer2:

be careful what you ask for, you always get it, not always the way you want, but you always get it :realmad:

Here is one of those forums:

This is low down, your boys can do better than this, or can they?

WHATELSE! :fly:

Have a wonderful day!



The new Spanish Minister of Defense, Jose Bono, is drawing the curtain from some of the events of early April when the US authorities in Iraq decided to attempt to arrest Muqtada al-Sadr in the wake of his self-identification with Hamas. It appears that at first the Coalition Provisional Authority and the US military command approached the poor Spanish about carrying out the arrest of Muqtada. The Spanish were in charge of Kufa and Najaf, where Muqtada is based.

The post-Franco, post-fascist Spanish military must have been absolutely astounded and disgusted by the Texan demand that they deliver Muqtada to the US "dead or alive." And, they immediately refused. Obviously, if the Spanish had taken the US bait and carried out the arrest, their forces would have faced the full fury of the Sadrists, who are capable of quite a lot of fury. This whole episode strikes me as shameful and cowardly on the Americans' part. It seems obvious that Bush, who must have made the decision to launch the largely unprovoked attack on Muqtada, was hoping to make the Spanish the fall guys. (Two pieces of evidence point to Bush: 1)We now know he was the one who ordered that "heads must roll" at Fallujah, so these major military campaigns are his idea; and, 2) the phraseology "take him dead or alive" is distinctively his.)

The Spanish response? "Fool me once, shame ... shame on ... you." Long, uncomfortable pause. "Fool me — can't get fooled again!"


The Spanish commanders also appear to have worried about the possibility of being implicated in American war crimes. They insisted, as of April 13, that the situation around Najaf was no longer covered by UN Security Council resolutions 1483 and 1511, which they felt authorized their participation in peace-keeping operations in Iraq, but did not cover military aggression of the sort the US was pursuing against the Sadrists.

This anecdote sheds further light on the haste with which Prime Minister Zapatero has withdrawn Spanish troops from Iraq. The knowledge that the US tried to arrange for the Spanish to take the fall for going after Muqtada must have convinced him that he should get out quick before the US dragged his country into deadly confrontation. The Spanish, having been in Najaf and Kufa for eight months, and, unlike the Americans, having actually made a study of the local situation, knew very well that going after Muqtada would stir up a hornet's nest, and perhaps plunge the south into a "large-scale military conflict" or at least a continuing low-grade guerrilla conflict, with themselves on the front lines.

The revelations also cast the Americans in an even poorer light as ignorant and arrogant incompetents. They were clearly completely unprepared for the insurgency throughout the South mounted by Muqtada's followers beginning April 4, the day after they came after his aides. It is one thing to be unprepared for a major military confrontation. It is another to be unprepared for it after you were warned about it by your close ally who was in charge of the affected area!

Here's the passage (my humble attempt at translation):
the Diario Malaga reports that, ' The minister of Defense, Jose Bono, revealed yesterday that the Spanish troops in Iraq were asked "to turn over dead or alive" "a certain religious leader", a reference the radical Shiite Muqtada Al Sadr, something which the Spanish command refused to do. In fact, the highest ranking Spanish officers in the Arab country sent a report at the beginning of April to the North American command in which they argued that increased harassment of the devotees of al-Sadr would trigger an aggravation of the situation.' But the Spanish refused: ' "The Occupying Powers can engage in offensive operations. The countries that are simply in the coalition, as in the case of Spain, cannot participate in offensive operations and, therefore, we said clearly that we were not prepared to deliver, as had been requested, a certain religious leader dead or alive." '

"We were there to help with pacification," [Bono] said. The highest-ranking Spanish military officers in charge in Iraq sent a report at the beginning of April to the North American command in which they observed that increased harassment of Al Sadr and his devotees would aggravate the situation in Iraq and would provoke "a large-scale military operation". '