Google
 

View Full Version : Trail Bikes - Terror On The Roads


Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

Kuegn
06-19-08, - 02:52 PM
It is actually a terrific idea to have a "cumpy" on a trail for the mere fact that the horns aren't loud enough for fellow motorist to hear in most instances. when faced with a situation where other motorists are not focused most times they don't hear the trail horn. A cumpy would be the ideal thingt to assist fellow motorist with acknowledgement of your presence. I do agree that some riders take it to the extreme and agitate other motorist intentionally. Had it not been for the cumpy many riders may have lost their lives due to close calls. Fact of the matter is fellow motorists don't respect bike riders when the too have to undergo the same procedure to licence and insure their bikes. For some reason they feel they have more right to the usage of the roads. So yes, a "cumpy" on a bike, especially when a cautious and experienced rider is on one, is a good idea. Fellow motorists contributed to the way bikers ride due to the fact that thay feel the bikes should not be allowed on the road cause they don't like them, yet they complain. It is a means of transportation. To each his own.....

Well, Raging Fire, you see, we don't have motorcycle lanes in this country. Therefore, motorcycle riders are meant to ride in the same traffic lanes as other vehicles. If this was followed, casualties would be all, but non-existent.

This does away with the notion of a cumpy being a good alert tool. By the way, the horns can be changed. However, I have no problem hearing motorcycle riders when they use their horns.

Also, I don't think any reasonable person hates motorcycles. they simply are annoyed by their noise pollution and reckless drivers.

Raging Fire
06-20-08, - 01:16 AM
IF YOU WERENT OVERTAKING AND RIDING DOWN THE CENTER OF THE STREET, RIDING THE WRONG WAY DOWN THE ROAD, OR PLAIN BEING A JACKA$$, THEN YOU WOULDN'T NEED TO BE "CUMPY" YOU POS. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY BUT WITH BEING THE LOUDEST ON THE BLOCK AND IMPRESSING THE 14 YEAR OLD GIRLS IN THE HIGH SCHOOLS.

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND PIANO WIRE ON SUNDAYS.

and please...how many of them bikes you think are actually "licensed AND insured"...
YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT, READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START OFF LOADING $HIT OUT OF YOUR NOODLES CAUSE IT'S EVIDENT YOU DON'T POSESS A BRAIN. SOUNDS LIKE YOU GAT A FETISH FOR 14 YEAR OLDS. SO WHAT, YOU EXPECT A BIKE RIDER TO RIDE IN THE BACK OF YOUR CAR AS IF IT IS ANOTHER CAR AYE? REALITY CHECK, "IT ISN'T" REMEMBER THAT. RIDING IN THE BACK OF A CAR IS NOT SAFE FOR A BIKER. THAT IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN RIDING UP THE MIDDLE. YOU RIDE A BIKE BEHIND A CAR AND SEE WHO THE JACKA$$ WOULD BE. YOU WOULD BE GLOWING WITH THE WORD JACKA$$ ALL OVER YOU. FACT REMAINS A "CUMPY" CAN ASSIST WITH ALERTING A$$HOLES LIKE YOURSELF ON OUR STREETS WHEN YOU NOT ONLY BE A DANGER TO YOURSELVES BUT TO THE BIKERS AS WELL.

Raging Fire
06-20-08, - 01:26 AM
Well, Raging Fire, you see, we don't have motorcycle lanes in this country. Therefore, motorcycle riders are meant to ride in the same traffic lanes as other vehicles. If this was followed, casualties would be all, but non-existent.
This does away with the notion of a cumpy being a good alert tool. By the way, the horns can be changed. However, I have no problem hearing motorcycle riders when they use their horns.
Also, I don't think any reasonable person hates motorcycles. they simply are annoyed by their noise pollution and reckless drivers.

THAT'S WHAT YOU THINK BUT TRY KNOWING. SEEMS THERE ARE NOT MANY REASONABLE PEOPLE IN OUR TIMES NOW. PEOPLE LITERALLY HATE BIKE RIDERS, THEY DON'T RESPECT BIKES AS A MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION. THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WAY MOST BIKERS RIDE. IT'S THE CAR DRIVERS THAT ARE MORE RECKLESS THAN ANYTHING. A BIKER HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO PAY ATTENTION AS HIS VEHICLE HAS ONLY 2 WHEELS AND HE NEEDS ALL LIMBS TO OPERATE IT. CAR DRIVERS ON THE OTHER HAND ARE DISTRACTED IN MILLIONS OF WAYS AND BECOME A DANGER TO OTHERS.

l_bones
06-20-08, - 02:39 AM
YOU'RE MISSING THE POINT, READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START OFF LOADING $HIT OUT OF YOUR NOODLES CAUSE IT'S EVIDENT YOU DON'T POSESS A BRAIN. SOUNDS LIKE YOU GAT A FETISH FOR 14 YEAR OLDS. SO WHAT, YOU EXPECT A BIKE RIDER TO RIDE IN THE BACK OF YOUR CAR AS IF IT IS ANOTHER CAR AYE? REALITY CHECK, "IT ISN'T" REMEMBER THAT. RIDING IN THE BACK OF A CAR IS NOT SAFE FOR A BIKER. THAT IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN RIDING UP THE MIDDLE. YOU RIDE A BIKE BEHIND A CAR AND SEE WHO THE JACKA$$ WOULD BE. YOU WOULD BE GLOWING WITH THE WORD JACKA$$ ALL OVER YOU. FACT REMAINS A "CUMPY" CAN ASSIST WITH ALERTING A$$HOLES LIKE YOURSELF ON OUR STREETS WHEN YOU NOT ONLY BE A DANGER TO YOURSELVES BUT TO THE BIKERS AS WELL.


hahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahaha. sounds like your another ****** trying to defend the "cumpy" group. funny how they don't have a seperate test for a motorcycle license here (technically even I posess one - and I'd have trouble starting the thing). I agree, it would defeat the purpose of having a motorcycle if you had to wait in traffic with the rest of us non-cumpies.

BUT that does not mean you have to ride your bike as loud and as fast as you possibly can on one wheel the wrong way against traffic.

i don't have a festish with 14 year olds. I wait till they're 16. duh - legal limit! :hammer:

i'm not too worried about this conversation, odds are you won't be around to continue it for much longer. i just feel sorry for all the people you hurt in the process of killing yourself.

AND actually, I believe a powered motorcycle over a certain size (ie not a bicycle with a small electric motor on it) has to pertain to the laws of the road, just like every other driver. For EXAMPLE only, if there is a double white line, no they should not be overtaking.

by the way (btw if you will) why can't you ride behind a car? It's the responsibility of the person BEHIND to pay attention to the one in front. any a$$hole that has actually taken and passed the drivers test can tell you that. but bike riders don't need that do they? nor do they need insurance. they can outrun the cops, if (heaven forbid) they decide to do something about it.

SpamStopper
06-20-08, - 07:32 AM
YOU EXPECT A BIKE RIDER TO RIDE IN THE BACK OF YOUR CAR AS IF IT IS ANOTHER CAR AYE?

THATS THE LAW, GET OFF THE ROAD IF YOU CANT FOLLOW IT.

Kuegn
06-20-08, - 05:49 PM
THATS THE LAW, GET OFF THE ROAD IF YOU CANT FOLLOW IT.

Exactly. I don't get what Raging Fire is trying to say here, because it doesn't make any sense.

We all have to be concerned about reckless drivers, it's not like we cautious drivers are free from harm. We have people in cars coming down the wrong side of the road EVERY DAY! But, we also have Motorcyclists floating their bikes down the wrong side of the road, in the middle of the road, on top of lamp poles, etc. LOL

But seriously, there is nothing to support the use of cumpy exhausts on motorbikes on the streets of Nassau. To say it alerts drivers, is not a strong case. That's what horns and lights are for. Along with proper adherance to traffic lanes.

Raging Fire
06-21-08, - 02:09 AM
I thought this thread was about the carelessness driving by bike riders... How did we get on this ?
As far as the right yes u do, but do it by yourself an do not take others with you...:bouncy:
READ THE THREAD CAREFULLY AND YOU'LL SEE, DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU WANT TO IN THE THREAD IT COVERS MORE THAN JUST CARELESSNESS WHICH SEEM TO BE THE FOCAL POINT BUT NONE THE LESS OTHER ISSUES ARE ALSO INCLUDED. LOOK AT IT THIS WAY, WE DON'T CHOOSE OUR OWN PUNISHMENT FOR OUR SINS. THE INNOCENT IS INNOCENT TO OTHERS WHEN ACCIDENTS OCCUR THAT THEY THEMSELVES DID NOT ORCHESTRATE BUT IN THE SIGHT OF GOD THEY HAVE A DEBT JUST LIKE YOURSELF.:taped2:

Raging Fire
06-21-08, - 02:12 AM
Exactly. I don't get what Raging Fire is trying to say here, because it doesn't make any sense.
We all have to be concerned about reckless drivers, it's not like we cautious drivers are free from harm. We have people in cars coming down the wrong side of the road EVERY DAY! But, we also have Motorcyclists floating their bikes down the wrong side of the road, in the middle of the road, on top of lamp poles, etc. LOL
But seriously, there is nothing to support the use of cumpy exhausts on motorbikes on the streets of Nassau. To say it alerts drivers, is not a strong case. That's what horns and lights are for. Along with proper adherance to traffic lanes.
IF IT NEVER ALERTED DRIVERS YOU WOULDN'T BE IN THIS FORUM ELABORATING ON THE ISSUE. WELL YOUR OPINION WOULD BE MERITLESS UNTIL YOU'VE EXPERIENCED BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE. UNTIL THEN :taped2:

Raging Fire
06-21-08, - 02:26 AM
THATS THE LAW, GET OFF THE ROAD IF YOU CANT FOLLOW IT.
AS IF YOU FOLLOW ALL LAWS. ONLY WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT TO INDIVIDUALS SUCH AS YOURSELF, STONES ARE THROWN. RIDE A BIKE BEHIND A CAR AND SEE IF IT WON'T DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD. ALWAYS LOOKING FOR WAYS TO CREATE CONFLICT, RIDICULE AND OPRESSION BECAUSE YOU'RE UNABLE TO SEE LIFE THROUGH ANOTHER MAN'S EYES.:taped2:

Raging Fire
06-21-08, - 02:45 AM
hahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahaha. sounds like your another ****** trying to defend the "cumpy" group. funny how they don't have a seperate test for a motorcycle license here (technically even I posess one - and I'd have trouble starting the thing). I agree, it would defeat the purpose of having a motorcycle if you had to wait in traffic with the rest of us non-cumpies.
BUT that does not mean you have to ride your bike as loud and as fast as you possibly can on one wheel the wrong way against traffic.
i don't have a festish with 14 year olds. I wait till they're 16. duh - legal limit! :hammer:
i'm not too worried about this conversation, odds are you won't be around to continue it for much longer. i just feel sorry for all the people you hurt in the process of killing yourself.
AND actually, I believe a powered motorcycle over a certain size (ie not a bicycle with a small electric motor on it) has to pertain to the laws of the road, just like every other driver. For EXAMPLE only, if there is a double white line, no they should not be overtaking.
by the way (btw if you will) why can't you ride behind a car? It's the responsibility of the person BEHIND to pay attention to the one in front. any a$$hole that has actually taken and passed the drivers test can tell you that. but bike riders don't need that do they? nor do they need insurance. they can outrun the cops, if (heaven forbid) they decide to do something about it.
IF THAT BE THE CASE THEN M@R@N$ SUCH AS YOUR SELF WOULD HAVE NO WORRIES. WHAT YOU BELIEVE ONLY HAS AN EFFECT ON YOUR OWN TROUBLED LIFE NOT MINE. AS FAR AS RELYING ON SOMEONE ELSE BEHIND TO PAY ATTENTION, WOULDN'T BE A GOOD IDEA IF A **** *** LIKE YOURSELF IS THAT PERSON. FOR THE MERE FACT THAT YOU HAVE ISSUES WITH BIKERS YOU'LL INTEND TO INFLICT HARM. ENCOUNTER CRUEL PEOPLE LIKE YOU EVERYDAY.:tdown:

SpamStopper
06-21-08, - 07:29 AM
AS IF YOU FOLLOW ALL LAWS. ONLY WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT TO INDIVIDUALS SUCH AS YOURSELF, STONES ARE THROWN. RIDE A BIKE BEHIND A CAR AND SEE IF IT WON'T DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD. ALWAYS LOOKING FOR WAYS TO CREATE CONFLICT, RIDICULE AND OPRESSION BECAUSE YOU'RE UNABLE TO SEE LIFE THROUGH ANOTHER MAN'S EYES.:taped2:

SpamStopper road a Motorbike in the US for years and ALWAYS followed the law. Most bike riders are pretty dumb here and dont have a clue how to ride a bike safely. They is even overtake then cut right in front of cars or make a 3rd lane like they think they is invincible .. bike riders dont last long in the Bahamas, they brain dead before they even get on a bike.

l_bones
06-22-08, - 04:17 AM
IF THAT BE THE CASE THEN M@R@N$ SUCH AS YOUR SELF WOULD HAVE NO WORRIES. WHAT YOU BELIEVE ONLY HAS AN EFFECT ON YOUR OWN TROUBLED LIFE NOT MINE. AS FAR AS RELYING ON SOMEONE ELSE BEHIND TO PAY ATTENTION, WOULDN'T BE A GOOD IDEA IF A **** *** LIKE YOURSELF IS THAT PERSON. FOR THE MERE FACT THAT YOU HAVE ISSUES WITH BIKERS YOU'LL INTEND TO INFLICT HARM. ENCOUNTER CRUEL PEOPLE LIKE YOU EVERYDAY.:tdown:

i still think this "user" or this "thread" won't last long...like spamstopper said...braindead before they even decide they so badass to ride a bike.

maybe i will start throwing open my doors when "cumpys" come "riding" by!

l_bones
06-22-08, - 04:20 AM
THE INNOCENT IS INNOCENT TO OTHERS WHEN ACCIDENTS OCCUR THAT THEY THEMSELVES DID NOT ORCHESTRATE BUT IN THE SIGHT OF GOD THEY HAVE A DEBT JUST LIKE YOURSELF.:taped2:

AWESOME! now we can kill random innocent people because obviously they are not innocent they have been immoral at some point they going straight to hell anyways.

Raging Fire
06-22-08, - 09:03 AM
SpamStopper road a Motorbike in the US for years and ALWAYS followed the law. Most bike riders are pretty dumb here and dont have a clue how to ride a bike safely. They is even overtake then cut right in front of cars or make a 3rd lane like they think they is invincible .. bike riders dont last long in the Bahamas, they brain dead before they even get on a bike.
LIKE YOU SAID IN THE "U.S". REALITY CHECK, THIS AINT THE U.S. THERE'S A VAST SPACE DIFFERENCE. AS FAR AS BEING BRAIN DEAD, GAT SOME PEOPLE BRAIN DEAD THAT WALK AROUND EVERY DAY IF THAT'S THE CASE. THE WORD "ACCIDENT" DOES HAVE A MEANING WHETHER YOU OR ANY ONE ELSE THINK PEOPLE INTENTIONALLY INFLICT HARM ON THEMSELVES OR OTHERS WHILE OPERATING A VEHICLE.

Raging Fire
06-22-08, - 09:08 AM
AWESOME! now we can kill random innocent people because obviously they are not innocent they have been immoral at some point they going straight to hell anyways.
PAY ATTENTION, ALL THINGS HAPPEN AT A CALCULATED TIME WHETHER WE THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE OR NOT. BEFORE THINGS HAPPEN THEY HAVE BEEN PLANNED BY THE ALMIGHTY LONG TIME. YOU AINT NO JUDGE TO SAY WHO INNOCENT OR NOT. YOU GAT CONTROL ON YOUR OWN SOUL, FIGURE WHERE THAT ENDS UP.