Iupdate
08-21-05, - 12:10 PM
There is a lot of talk and brag about democracy, democracy. How silly it is that we brag about democracy when democracy now justifies the means for war and depredation of human rights and lives. It all boils down to just another uncertain and indefinite experiment to be scrapped later for something else. The drums of democracy has long been sounding as a way and means towards a common and civilize world. The drums made their sound but not much joined the march, but now all may march sooner by force. Isn’t it amazing how all things come to be, as I look back into history I see that force is largely responsible for the order that governs mind while material reward governs and makes loyal the hearts. Is that it? is this not the democracy that we so cherish and others perish for? But Why?
Every four or five years the people gather to decide their leaders through an electoral process. How much good is this when more than half the number has been paying attention to Mickey mouse instead of who or what they are voting for? This makes as much sense as a student walking up to receive his graduate diploma where he has not even taken the exams or attended classes. We vote to have a voice but once these kings sit on the seats of power we become pigs of their experiments, experiments that usually exclude their friends and relative but instead resulting in high suffering human tolls, a waist and squandering of public funds in their bid to satisfy their tit-for-tat rages. This makes as much sense as a drunk giving up his bottle in promise for the hands of a beautiful bride, but once this is done he picks up the bottle again and forces his bride into submission. What’s the difference? Theocracy and communism oppress, ignore, slaughter families and have families slaughtered? Is democracy also not the same experiment? Why, the same rhetorical device, and what on earth for?
But it has yet more leverage in its pipeline and Unless the system of democracy is allowed to evolve I’ll say then that democracy has just about reached its limits and maximum point of effectiveness. In the way it is, taken largely as a vehicle for political, commercial, industrial and personal interest driving humans more so apart rather than towards unity for a closer and harmonious relation with each other. Lacking the necessary drive democracy has been unable to manage the swelling or flux of a present day human is society no better than the rest of the older mass governing experiments. So then why all the brags and talk about democracy when it is the same as the other failed and failing experiments and in some ways, far lesser?
In conclusion, neither one of these system including theocracy, communism or democracy are failures in themselves. Each is a workable experimental system and any would do just as good as the other, but only, and if the men appointed resist the temptation of ordained and honored authority to hurdle humans like cattle’s as they choose. And, if only the men appointed resist the temptation of ordained and honored authority remain loyal to the interest of people rather than immortal image, or personal interest.
How wonderful any one of these system would be if citizens were allowed to work voluntarily. And since we speak of patriotism, then why get paid or set out to gain to work for your country in the first place? If it was so, who would do it, who would be patriotic? Then again this is another subject.
Every four or five years the people gather to decide their leaders through an electoral process. How much good is this when more than half the number has been paying attention to Mickey mouse instead of who or what they are voting for? This makes as much sense as a student walking up to receive his graduate diploma where he has not even taken the exams or attended classes. We vote to have a voice but once these kings sit on the seats of power we become pigs of their experiments, experiments that usually exclude their friends and relative but instead resulting in high suffering human tolls, a waist and squandering of public funds in their bid to satisfy their tit-for-tat rages. This makes as much sense as a drunk giving up his bottle in promise for the hands of a beautiful bride, but once this is done he picks up the bottle again and forces his bride into submission. What’s the difference? Theocracy and communism oppress, ignore, slaughter families and have families slaughtered? Is democracy also not the same experiment? Why, the same rhetorical device, and what on earth for?
But it has yet more leverage in its pipeline and Unless the system of democracy is allowed to evolve I’ll say then that democracy has just about reached its limits and maximum point of effectiveness. In the way it is, taken largely as a vehicle for political, commercial, industrial and personal interest driving humans more so apart rather than towards unity for a closer and harmonious relation with each other. Lacking the necessary drive democracy has been unable to manage the swelling or flux of a present day human is society no better than the rest of the older mass governing experiments. So then why all the brags and talk about democracy when it is the same as the other failed and failing experiments and in some ways, far lesser?
In conclusion, neither one of these system including theocracy, communism or democracy are failures in themselves. Each is a workable experimental system and any would do just as good as the other, but only, and if the men appointed resist the temptation of ordained and honored authority to hurdle humans like cattle’s as they choose. And, if only the men appointed resist the temptation of ordained and honored authority remain loyal to the interest of people rather than immortal image, or personal interest.
How wonderful any one of these system would be if citizens were allowed to work voluntarily. And since we speak of patriotism, then why get paid or set out to gain to work for your country in the first place? If it was so, who would do it, who would be patriotic? Then again this is another subject.