a1000
12-27-06, - 04:53 PM
This individual can be sumed in one paragraph in his fringe of surealistic and misleading social praxis...mascarading as intellectualism! For example:
We are confronted by two types of social contradictions - those between ourselves and the enemy and those among the people themselves. The two are totally different in their nature.
On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1957), 1st pocket ed.. p. 2.
Any student of classical communism knows that herein lays pure "dictatorship of the proletariat vs ownes of production"!!! And the conflict within the people is simply a "blind shy" for one class having a need to become owners of production themselves!
You see the chairman failed to see that under a utopian society the people do not lose the desire for acquisition and affluency!
In addition, the chairman promised that in the absence of ordinary work incentives, the classless/stateless people will produce more goods than that of the capitalistic society!
However, what happened instead is that the goal of absolute saturation of people production and equal distribution of the proceeds of national production never materailized...even under force!
So, in reality, the people's force was asked to endure revolutionary slaughter of an entire class of people, suppression and elimination of decent, expropriation of private property.
Then they were asked to endure a dictator proletariat which themselves become a base of force and excess that is unrestricted by law or convention...while the people further are subjected to suppression of the free press,freedom of expressiona and assembly, the introduction of slave/labour camps, constant observation by secret police, poverty of collective farming, extended and manditory military service, and finally a economic doctrine that in reality of human existance, promises a life of ragged subsistance for the rest of their natural lives!
Quit frankly when I read the little red book (I did'nt leave home without it), it make less sense than Marx, Lenin, Trotsky or Lenin all put together!!!:gi:
From the time Bakunin's Capital entered Tsarist Russia in 1868, the term "workers unit" has been promising equality and aboudance...but has delivered nothing less than death and suppression of human beings for the warped and stupid thinking of a few "elitists" that can't be anything...unless they force the people to do so!!! :shhh:
Thank you for your response Licks, however I brought Chairman Mao work out as an example of a peoples response to self determination. If you are going to be free! Then you have to as a people be the Author of that freedom, we as a people have to write the theory and the paraxis of our national culture, you dont just take over the machinations of your slave masters. Do you get it?
This thread is not concerned with wheather Mao was write or wrong what is the principle concern is the Chairmans contribution to the feild of self determination of a people.
See they never do this in school thats why there is a proliferation of Block heads. What happen in the bahamas? Well we simply took over the country from the british, we did not even at this moment have any idea how to run a country that serves us as a people instead of being a colony to what ever european nation wants to use us. This is the essential nature of the example of chairman Mao.
Think about this? In fact just think, I know its a hard thing to do when most of your thoughts have been forced down your throught, but some times try it and when you do you will be one step closer to being free.
Free your mind.
Clint:)
We are confronted by two types of social contradictions - those between ourselves and the enemy and those among the people themselves. The two are totally different in their nature.
On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1957), 1st pocket ed.. p. 2.
Any student of classical communism knows that herein lays pure "dictatorship of the proletariat vs ownes of production"!!! And the conflict within the people is simply a "blind shy" for one class having a need to become owners of production themselves!
You see the chairman failed to see that under a utopian society the people do not lose the desire for acquisition and affluency!
In addition, the chairman promised that in the absence of ordinary work incentives, the classless/stateless people will produce more goods than that of the capitalistic society!
However, what happened instead is that the goal of absolute saturation of people production and equal distribution of the proceeds of national production never materailized...even under force!
So, in reality, the people's force was asked to endure revolutionary slaughter of an entire class of people, suppression and elimination of decent, expropriation of private property.
Then they were asked to endure a dictator proletariat which themselves become a base of force and excess that is unrestricted by law or convention...while the people further are subjected to suppression of the free press,freedom of expressiona and assembly, the introduction of slave/labour camps, constant observation by secret police, poverty of collective farming, extended and manditory military service, and finally a economic doctrine that in reality of human existance, promises a life of ragged subsistance for the rest of their natural lives!
Quit frankly when I read the little red book (I did'nt leave home without it), it make less sense than Marx, Lenin, Trotsky or Lenin all put together!!!:gi:
From the time Bakunin's Capital entered Tsarist Russia in 1868, the term "workers unit" has been promising equality and aboudance...but has delivered nothing less than death and suppression of human beings for the warped and stupid thinking of a few "elitists" that can't be anything...unless they force the people to do so!!! :shhh:
Thank you for your response Licks, however I brought Chairman Mao work out as an example of a peoples response to self determination. If you are going to be free! Then you have to as a people be the Author of that freedom, we as a people have to write the theory and the paraxis of our national culture, you dont just take over the machinations of your slave masters. Do you get it?
This thread is not concerned with wheather Mao was write or wrong what is the principle concern is the Chairmans contribution to the feild of self determination of a people.
See they never do this in school thats why there is a proliferation of Block heads. What happen in the bahamas? Well we simply took over the country from the british, we did not even at this moment have any idea how to run a country that serves us as a people instead of being a colony to what ever european nation wants to use us. This is the essential nature of the example of chairman Mao.
Think about this? In fact just think, I know its a hard thing to do when most of your thoughts have been forced down your throught, but some times try it and when you do you will be one step closer to being free.
Free your mind.
Clint:)