Really...is anyone being fooled by the rallys they are having??
All of a sudden...they can have rally's now!!
LOL.....

Talk about the issues face to face....and not in a heap of sweep up in the wind rhetoric!
:sparky:

Tommy T still looks lost in the headlights....but ex pm ingraham looks strong as usual, but is that what we want again??

Where are the FNM's top brass.....if they have any!
Show me the money ghad dangit!!
:hammer:

Really...is anyone being fooled by the rallys they are having??
All of a sudden...they can have rally's now!!
LOL.....
Talk about the issues face to face....and not in a heap of sweep up in the wind rhetoric!
:sparky:
Tommy T still looks lost in the headlights....but ex pm ingraham looks strong as usual, but is that what we want again??
Where are the FNM's top brass.....if they have any!
Show me the money ghad dangit!!
:hammer:
Well, listen and learn - things good, for who and where ?

Well, listen and learn - things good, for who and where ?


If it isnt good for you ever....then you are out of luck!
Anyone who was an FNM supporter during their term, and who didnt get straight should shut their mouths and get a better stake in this country now!

But you wont...becasue you just like to complain!
LOL
:shaky:

Ingraham said at their rally at Regatta Park last night that the new PLP is just as crooked and corrupt as the PLP voted out in 1992, but not nearly as effective ( I infered that he meant actually getting things done). He said that they are very good at throwing partys, socialising and whispering sweet nothings.It was ironic to hear Mr. Ingraham make thsese statements, because as he himself pointed out, both he and Mr. Christie were fired from the Pindling government for speaking out against corruption in 1984. Has Mr. Christie changed, or are Mr. Ingrahams remarks untrue?

Ingraham said at their rally at Regatta Park last night that the new PLP is just as crooked and corrupt as the PLP voted out in 1992, but not nearly as effective ( I infered that he meant actually getting things done). He said that they are very good at throwing partys, socialising and whispering sweet nothings.It was ironic to hear Mr. Ingraham make thsese statements, because as he himself pointed out, both he and Mr. Christie were fired from the Pindling government for speaking out against corruption in 1984. Has Mr. Christie changed, or are Mr. Ingrahams remarks untrue?
Well, Christie has not changed, Ingraham's remarks are true. You have to keep in mind, Christie returned to the Old PLP. The old PLP now calls themselves the NEW PLP, but nothing has changed with the old/new PLP. It is still the PLP. The problem is the players of the PLP, they are all back, and then are the controlling forces. You just watch it. Go to a PLP function and you will see that all the players are right there wheeling and dealing their crooked ways.

Well, Christie has not changed, Ingraham's remarks are true. You have to keep in mind, Christie returned to the Old PLP. The old PLP now calls themselves the NEW PLP, but nothing has changed with the old/new PLP. It is still the PLP. The problem is the players of the PLP, they are all back, and then are the controlling forces. You just watch it. Go to a PLP function and you will see that all the players are right there wheeling and dealing their crooked ways.


That is way too confusing!
LOL...the old new old new....heheheh

make up your mind!
:D

That is way too confusing!
LOL...the old new old new....heheheh
make up your mind!
:D
LOL - I think you should direct your question to the PLP, the OLD PLP/NEW PLP, but yet their ways and the PLAYERS REMAIN the same. Maybe that may be a little much for you ??.

Take a break study the situation then, eventually it MAY come to you, you will get it after a while.

I do hope so, ...I really do..., Confusion is in the heart and not the head.

LOL - I think you should direct your question to the PLP, the OLD PLP/NEW PLP, but yet their ways and the PLAYERS REMAIN the same. Maybe that may be a little much for you ??.
Take a break study the situation then, eventually it MAY come to you, you will get it after a while.
I do hope so, ...I really do..., Confusion is in the heart and not the head.


Well if i am confused...you arent doing much to help!

p.s.
I can tell the difference between thoughtful and confusing!
You are bordering in insanity...that a100 guys "namaste" is having an effect on you!
:dunce:

LOL - I think you should direct your question to the PLP, the OLD PLP/NEW PLP, but yet their ways and the PLAYERS REMAIN the same. Maybe that may be a little much for you ??.
Take a break study the situation then, eventually it MAY come to you, you will get it after a while.
I do hope so, ...I really do..., Confusion is in the heart and not the head.

Well if i am confused...you arent doing much to help!
p.s.
I can tell the difference between thoughtful and confusing!
You are bordering on insanity...that a100 guy "namaste" is having an effect on you!
:dunce:

Well, Christie has not changed, Ingraham's remarks are true..

Since the elections of May, 2002, I have not heard a single person allege that Mr. Christie is personally corrupt. Since he has not changed we have to assume that he abhores such practices. Why then, since he is in charge and sets the tone, would he tolerate corruption and foolishness in his government?

Since the elections of May, 2002, I have not heard a single person allege that Mr. Christie is personally corrupt.


I do; remember that newspaper in England.
He (The PM) sued and won.

Ingraham said at their rally at Regatta Park last night that the new PLP is just as crooked and corrupt as the PLP voted out in 1992, but not nearly as effective ( I infered that he meant actually getting things done). He said that they are very good at throwing partys, socialising and whispering sweet nothings.It was ironic to hear Mr. Ingraham make thsese statements, because as he himself pointed out, both he and Mr. Christie were fired from the Pindling government for speaking out against corruption in 1984. Has Mr. Christie changed, or are Mr. Ingrahams remarks untrue?


bey dis time i so friggin vex i miss the rally back home in exuma.. they had to have it a week after i left lol

Since the elections of May, 2002, I have not heard a single person allege that Mr. Christie is personally corrupt. Since he has not changed we have to assume that he abhores such practices. Why then, since he is in charge and sets the tone, would he tolerate corruption and foolishness in his government?


Cause he's a puppet and cant do anything about it. The coruption is too deep, its beyond his administration, it is in the government companies themselves, the one that never changes from one party to the next.

If it isnt good for you ever....then you are out of luck!
Anyone who was an FNM supporter during their term, and who didnt get straight should shut their mouths and get a better stake in this country now!
But you wont...becasue you just like to complain!
LOL
:shaky:


I think this shows your true colours - someone supported a party and "didn't get straight"? So it's safe to say that you are getting straight right now? What's that mean you're a lazy SOB that waits around for someone to "straighten you out" because you can't earn a living on your own?
Your better stake sounds more like taking a piece of the "steak" / bahamas for yourself while you can because if things change you won't be able to.
:dgi:

Since the elections of May, 2002, I have not heard a single person allege that Mr. Christie is personally corrupt. Since he has not changed we have to assume that he abhores such practices. Why then, since he is in charge and sets the tone, would he tolerate corruption and foolishness in his government?

Stubbs was bankrupt and he didn't enforce the law that states if an MP is bankrupt then he is out
All the money for local gov't for Alfred Grey's constituency was "lost" when his ministry was repsonsible for local gov't? They send two police officers to investigate? Maybe gray wasn't party to this because it was such a small amount of money but I never heard what happened to resolve this.
Christie might not be personally corrupt but he has surronded himself with some pretty corrupt people.
Who gave woods back the job at Bahamasair? Wasn't it already decided that he was "corrupt"?