View Full Version : Adulterous
Hottstepper2 06-22-06, - 10:34 PM WOMEN TODAY IN THE BAHAMAS THAT ARE MARRIED TO THESE NO GOOD MEN NEED TO LEARN HOW TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILTY FOR THEIR MARRIAGES. I HAVE A FRIEND THAT WAS WOMAN NAMED IN A DIVORCE I THINK THAT IS SO WRONG HOW COULD U TAKE SOMEONE ELSE TO COURT AND SAY IN ONE WAY THAT UR HUSBAND HAS HAD VARIOUS ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS IN UR MARRIAGE AND CONTINUES TO HAVE ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS BUT U ONLY NAME ONE PERSON OUR COURT SYSTEM NEEDS TO CHANGE AND AFTER ALL THAT ISSUES.......... THE MARRIED WOMAN IS ALLOWED TO SUE THE OTHER FEMALE FOR THE ENDING OF HER MARRIAGE. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO U THAT MAYBE U SAT BACK ALL THESE YEARS AND ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN
HERE ARE MY ISSUES WHOS TO SAY THAT YOUR HUSBAND ADMITTED TO BEING MARRIED EVEN SO NO ONE PUT A GUN TO HIS HEAD TO CHEAT ON YOU AND IF U PUT UP WITH THIS FOR YEARS I FEEL LIKE YOU NEED TO GO TO COURT JUST THE TWO OF U AND DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THAT OTHER WOMAN NEVER STOOD BEFORE ANY PASTOR WITH U SO SHE NEEDS NOT TO HONOUR U IN ANY WAY
THE ENDING ISSUES ARE JUST THE TWO OF U LAID DOWN AT NIGHT JUST BOTH OF U DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING THAT HE CHEATED ON U BUT I THINK IT’S WRONG THAT YOU BE ALLOWED TO BRING IN SOMEONE ELSE IN U AND UR HUSBANDS BUSINESS AND NAME THAT PERSON
THE COURT SHOULDN’T ALLOW THAT
:hammer:
RockWell 06-22-06, - 10:46 PM WOMEN TODAY IN THE BAHAMAS THAT ARE MARRIED TO THESE NO GOOD MEN NEED TO LEARN HOW TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILTY FOR THEIR MARRIAGES. I HAVE A FRIEND THAT WAS WOMAN NAMED IN A DIVORCE I THINK THAT IS SO WRONG HOW COULD U TAKE SOMEONE ELSE TO COURT AND SAY IN ONE WAY THAT UR HUSBAND HAS HAD VARIOUS ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS IN UR MARRIAGE AND CONTINUES TO HAVE ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS BUT U ONLY NAME ONE PERSON OUR COURT SYSTEM NEEDS TO CHANGE AND AFTER ALL THAT ISSUES.......... THE MARRIED WOMAN IS ALLOWED TO SUE THE OTHER FEMALE FOR THE ENDING OF HER MARRIAGE. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO U THAT MAYBE U SAT BACK ALL THESE YEARS AND ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN
HERE ARE MY ISSUES WHOS TO SAY THAT YOUR HUSBAND ADMITTED TO BEING MARRIED EVEN SO NO ONE PUT A GUN TO HIS HEAD TO CHEAT ON YOU AND IF U PUT UP WITH THIS FOR YEARS I FEEL LIKE YOU NEED TO GO TO COURT JUST THE TWO OF U AND DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THAT OTHER WOMAN NEVER STOOD BEFORE ANY PASTOR WITH U SO SHE NEEDS NOT TO HONOUR U IN ANY WAY
THE ENDING ISSUES ARE JUST THE TWO OF U LAID DOWN AT NIGHT JUST BOTH OF U DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING THAT HE CHEATED ON U BUT I THINK IT’S WRONG THAT YOU BE ALLOWED TO BRING IN SOMEONE ELSE IN U AND UR HUSBANDS BUSINESS AND NAME THAT PERSON
THE COURT SHOULDN’T ALLOW THAT
:hammer:
Time now some of these women so scandalous,she might of pushed her way into the wife's veiwpoint, so she just retaliate the best way she could. JMO
Hottstepper2 06-22-06, - 10:53 PM No There Is No Contact What So Ever Between These Two Women Never Seen Each Other Nothing No Conversation Nothing No Confrontation At All ...................but Forget About That In General Whether Or Not There May Have Been A Confrontation I Still Feel Like She Shold Deal With Her Husband. Unless That Women Becomes A Physical Treat To Her Or Her Family Or Something That May Be Getting Out Of Hand Then So Be It Bound That To Keep The Peace But If Ur Just Filling For A Divorce Because Ur Tired Of His No I Don't Feel Its Fair To Point The Finger At The Person Who May Be There At The Time If It Was Going On For Years...
But In This Situation My Friend At A Baby For Him And He Admited It To His Wife And He Also Signed For His Child So She Feels Disrespected And Then We Go Back To My Point She Needs To Deal With Her Husband
RockWell 06-22-06, - 11:00 PM No There Is No Contact What So Ever Between These Two Women Never Seen Each Other Nothing No Conversation Nothing No Confrontation At All ...................but Forget About That In General Whether Or Not There May Have Been A Confrontation I Still Feel Like She Shold Deal With Her Husband. Unless That Women Becomes A Physical Treat To Her Or Her Family Or Something That May Be Getting Out Of Hand Then So Be It Bound That To Keep The Peace But If Ur Just Filling For A Divorce Because Ur Tired Of His No I Don't Feel Its Fair To Point The Finger At The Person Who May Be There At The Time If It Was Going On For Years...
But In This Situation My Friend At A Baby For Him And He Admited It To His Wife And He Also Signed For His Child So She Feels Disrespected And Then We Go Back To My Point She Needs To Deal With Her Husband
Uh! How more physical a threat she need to be than sleeping with her husband? :dgi: BTW: She is pointing the blame where it squarely belongs on both parties,cause the mistress aint innocent either.
Truth Hurts 06-22-06, - 11:00 PM Why do we care about two adult affairs hotstepper?
islandtransy 06-23-06, - 12:25 AM :taped2: I GUESS IM GUILTY 4:sparky: SLEEPING WITH THEM MY BAD
Shakita 06-23-06, - 07:15 AM You are right she shouldnt deal with the other woman, but hey you cant blame her for the other woman is as responsible as the man. She has no business sleeping witn another man and why do you think she goes and have a child for him? Usually is with the hope they leave the wife.
Hurt and bitter, I give the wives credit for not kicking their butt at least.
RockWell 06-23-06, - 08:58 AM You are right she shouldnt deal with the other woman, but hey you cant blame her for the other woman is as responsible as the man. She has no business sleeping witn another man and why do you think she goes and have a child for him? Usually is with the hope they leave the wife.
Hurt and bitter, I give the wives credit for not kicking their butt at least.
:eek: Can you say double speak!
will2274 06-23-06, - 10:40 AM WOMEN TODAY IN THE BAHAMAS THAT ARE MARRIED TO THESE NO GOOD MEN NEED TO LEARN HOW TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILTY FOR THEIR MARRIAGES. I HAVE A FRIEND THAT WAS WOMAN NAMED IN A DIVORCE I THINK THAT IS SO WRONG HOW COULD U TAKE SOMEONE ELSE TO COURT AND SAY IN ONE WAY THAT UR HUSBAND HAS HAD VARIOUS ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS IN UR MARRIAGE AND CONTINUES TO HAVE ADULTEROUS AFFAIRS BUT U ONLY NAME ONE PERSON OUR COURT SYSTEM NEEDS TO CHANGE AND AFTER ALL THAT ISSUES.......... THE MARRIED WOMAN IS ALLOWED TO SUE THE OTHER FEMALE FOR THE ENDING OF HER MARRIAGE. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO U THAT MAYBE U SAT BACK ALL THESE YEARS AND ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN
HERE ARE MY ISSUES WHOS TO SAY THAT YOUR HUSBAND ADMITTED TO BEING MARRIED EVEN SO NO ONE PUT A GUN TO HIS HEAD TO CHEAT ON YOU AND IF U PUT UP WITH THIS FOR YEARS I FEEL LIKE YOU NEED TO GO TO COURT JUST THE TWO OF U AND DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THAT OTHER WOMAN NEVER STOOD BEFORE ANY PASTOR WITH U SO SHE NEEDS NOT TO HONOUR U IN ANY WAY
THE ENDING ISSUES ARE JUST THE TWO OF U LAID DOWN AT NIGHT JUST BOTH OF U DEAL WITH UR ISSUES THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING THAT HE CHEATED ON U BUT I THINK IT’S WRONG THAT YOU BE ALLOWED TO BRING IN SOMEONE ELSE IN U AND UR HUSBANDS BUSINESS AND NAME THAT PERSON
THE COURT SHOULDN’T ALLOW THAT:hammer:
Well first of all, in that case, ITS THE LAW!
If she is petitioning for Divorce, on the grounds of adultery, the suspected person(not always another woman by the way) which the act was committed with MUST BE NAMED!
Other grounds based on, abuse, abandonment, mental torture, etc, don't require the naming of anyone else-for obvious reasons.
On the other hand, it may not be entirely the 'other' woman's fault. We men are tricky. Sometimes we don't tell these women we are married, they fall for us and when they find out the truth, they are so deep "in love" that it don't matter-these ones usually get pregnant in hopes that you leave your wife for them. The men are at fault for these affairs
Then there are the 'home-wreckers' who only go after married men- these are the ones who deserve a good cut-***** from the wives. The men are NOT at fault for these affairs- We are weak, ITS VERY HARD FOR A MAN TO TURN DOWN FRONT!
lol @ this thread ... well the other woman has the right to counter sue also .. their marriage is really none of her business, thats a religious thing between them, not her ..
that said, i myself would never (knowingly) sleep with someone elses girlfriend, married or not. And if they really want to be together then the man should be upfront with his girlfriend and break it off first ... anyone say prenup ..??
(BTW its not that hard to turn it down, i do it all the time )
de redhead 06-23-06, - 01:55 PM lol @ this thread ... well the other woman has the right to counter sue also .. their marriage is really none of her business, thats a religious thing between them, not her ..
that said, i myself would never (knowingly) sleep with someone elses girlfriend, married or not. And if they really want to be together then the man should be upfront with his girlfriend and break it off first ... anyone say prenup ..??
(BTW its not that hard to turn it down, i do it all the time )
Yeah Right
WinterGrace 06-23-06, - 05:59 PM Is this woman the only hard evidence the wifey could catch?
Hottstepper2 06-23-06, - 06:51 PM Well first of all, in that case, ITS THE LAW!
If she is petitioning for Divorce, on the grounds of adultery, the suspected person(not always another woman by the way) which the act was committed with MUST BE NAMED!
Other grounds based on, abuse, abandonment, mental torture, etc, don't require the naming of anyone else-for obvious reasons.
On the other hand, it may not be entirely the 'other' woman's fault. We men are tricky. Sometimes we don't tell these women we are married, they fall for us and when they find out the truth, they are so deep "in love" that it don't matter-these ones usually get pregnant in hopes that you leave your wife for them. The men are at fault for these affairs
Then there are the 'home-wreckers' who only go after married men- these are the ones who deserve a good cut-***** from the wives. The men are NOT at fault for these affairs- We are weak, ITS VERY HARD FOR A MAN TO TURN DOWN FRONT!
WELL ACTUALLY SHES PETITIONING ON THE GROUNDS OF CRUELTY BUT THATS ANOTHER TOPIC
AND AM GOING TO LEAVE THIS TOPIC ALONE BECAUSE THERE R SO MANY THINGS GOING ON HERE AND I DON'T WANT TO MAKE IT ABOUT ANY ONE SITUATION ALL AM SAYINGS IS THAT ITS WRONG TO NAME ANY ONE PERSON IF U KNOW THAT UR HUSBAND HAS BEEN CHEATING ON U FOR YEARS AND U TWO ARE NOT SLEEPING TOGETHER AND HASN'T BEEN SLEEPING TOGETHER FOR YEARS SO LIKE THAT I FEEL LIKE U SHOULD DEAL WITH THE MAN THATS MY OPNION
Hottstepper2 06-23-06, - 06:59 PM Is this woman the only hard evidence the wifey could catch?
NA LOLOLOL ITS NOT FUNNY BUT READING THE PETITON I WOULDN'T WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THAT MY HUSBAND HAS TREATED ME LIKE CRAP FOR OVER A DECADE AND MY SELF ESTEEM WAS SO LOW THAT I STAY OTHER THINGS ARE NAMED IN THE PETITION BUT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY ISSUE I DON'T CARE ABOUT THEIR ISSUE IN THE HOME OR HOW HE MAY HAVE MENTALLY ABUSED HER THEIR ENTIRE MARRIAGE I JUST FEEL LIKE ITS WRONG TO NAME THE WOMAN THAT HAPPENS TO BE THERE AT THE TIME WHEN U STATE IN UR PETITION THAT THERE R FOUR OTHER CHILDREN BORN WITHIN THE MARRIAGE AND VARIOUS AFFAIRS AND CONTINUES TO HAVE VARIOUS AFFAIRS AND OTHER WOMEN COMING TO UR HOME ..................BUT BECAUSE THAT HAPPENS TO BE THE CHILD HE SIGNED FOR THATS THE WOMAN U NAME I FEEL LIKE SHE HAS AN ISSUE WITH HIM OWNING HIS CHILD OR SUPPORT HIS CHILD BECAUSE SHE NEVER HAD AN ISSUE BEFORE
nationbuilder 06-23-06, - 07:00 PM Whats the essential point of this thread? The wife naming the adulteress doesnt mean she is SUING her, as you said at the onset Hotsteppa. I mean if you sleep with a married man..s%$t happens sometimes. So if that s#$t happens to be you getting named in a petition - oh well, sucks to be you. The point of the law is that the spouse offended can take certain actions and that just happens to be one of them.
The fact about marriage is that it always is about both persons, both have to work to make a marriage work. No woman can keep a man that dont wanna be kept - i dont care how she work it or twerk it.
And by the way..you een pulling a reverse psychology on us saying this woman in question is YOUR FRIEND when its actually YOU ey Steppa?:cutie:
|
|