Google
 

View Full Version : Pre-clearence Facilities in Grand Bahama under threat of closure???


Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

bahamiangoddess
06-29-06, - 06:34 PM
By BARBARA WALKIN
Senior FN Reporter
barbara@nasguard.com
Foreign Affairs Minister Fred Mitchell affirmed yesterday that no immediate steps are being taken to close the U.S. pre-clearance facilities in Grand Bahama.
Mitchell, who was in Grand Bahama for several meetings, spoke on the matter during a press briefing in the Office of the Prime Minister.
He was addressing concerns of Bahamians who frequently travel to the United States regarding the closure of the U. S. pre-clearance facilities at the local airport and harbour.
Mitchell explained that the United States government conducts a review every year which is channeled through its Embassy in The Bahamas, as it does with all its embassies around the world.
The review also applies to the pre-clearance in Nassau and Freeport, he added.
Mitchell also noted that the U. S. Ambassador to The Bahamas is required to report annually to his government, as to whether or not the facilities are serving the purpose for which they were sent to The Bahamas.
"This includes an analysis of the cost effectiveness of the agencies and their work. So one of the factors they looked at is what they saw as a drop in the volumes of tourists passing through the facilities here in Freeport," said Mitchell. "We have not been told by any means that the facilities will be closed."
He noted that the U. S. government believes there maybe a more cost effective way of dealing with it, given that all of the destinations – flights to the United States from Freeport – have Customs clearance at those destinations, with the exception of Myrtle Beach.
"And that is not a large proportion in their view of the volume of traffic. I think significantly, that the traffic has probably fallen off as a result of the Royal Oasis closure and the junkets coming in from the States through the airport," he said.
"Although the Government has not been told that the facilities will be closed, it should be made clear that these facilities do not exist in a vacuum, they exist in a context.
"And one context is the cost effectiveness of it and that of course that has to do with the general foreign policy aims of the United States government."
He explained that the U. S. government made it quite clear that one of their foreign policy aims is to ensure that a viable economy exist in The Bahamas.
"Because in their view, there is no point in having an impoverished country on their doorstep because it only leads to other issues," said Mitchell, noting that is not the only factor that goes into deciding whether the facilities continue here or not.
"They have stated that the review is on going. The Ambassador has just returned from the United States where he's had talks with leaders in both the Senate and Congress, and there is a lot of sympathy for the facility to remain."
From the Government's point, Mitchell said it was indicated how important the facility is to the economy of Grand Bahama and the larger Bahamas.
"We've said that the drop in volumes is really due to the hurricanes and that the hotel was closed. We expect within short order for the hotel to be back online and we expect in short order the West End facilities to be up and running," he said.
"So with these projects coming on stream it is viable that the pre-clearance facility should remain here," said Mitchell, revealing that the Grand Bahama Port Authority has made the seem case.
The second issue by the U. S. government regarded security, said Mitchell.
"But our Government has committed to work with the US government in all these matters, he added.
However, added Mitchell, "the discussions are good, I am expected to meet with the Secretary of State to discuss this and other issues sometime in July."
CLEARING UP THE MATTER — Minister of Foreign Affairs, Fred Mitchell said that no immediate steps are being taken to close the U. S. pre-clearance facilities in Grand Bahama. However, the U. S. government is reviewing the case and arguments for the facility to remain in Freeport.(Staff photo by BRADLEY Rutherford)

pharoah
06-29-06, - 07:11 PM
Interesting. Fred them joking...

chancellor
06-29-06, - 08:33 PM
Is it just me, or is it everytime the PLP is in power Freeport must "bend"? Seriously.

Anyway, it will be in the best intrest of the government the GB does not lose the pre-clearance.

nationbuilder
06-29-06, - 08:48 PM
Is it just me, or is it everytime the PLP is in power Freeport must "bend"? Seriously.
Anyway, it will be in the best intrest of the government the GB does not lose the pre-clearance.

:hammer:

de redhead
07-01-06, - 10:55 AM
Is it just me, or is it everytime the PLP is in power Freeport must "bend"? Seriously.
Anyway, it will be in the best intrest of the government the GB does not lose the pre-clearance.


I think you got this mixed up.

Alien
07-01-06, - 11:09 AM
What is "pre-clearance"?
Do not mean to sound flippant...but, can the GB people jump on a plane and travel to Miami if they want to?

Explain...with no hype or spin please.

casualobserver
07-01-06, - 11:20 AM
What is "pre-clearance"?
Do not mean to sound flippant...but, can the GB people jump on a plane and travel to Miami if they want to?
Explain...with no hype or spin please.


Simply, it's the pre-clearance of United States Customs and Immigration BEFORE you get on the plane in Freeport or Nassau.

There is no pre-clearance of ships like Discovery or Regal Empress though.

Alien
07-01-06, - 12:55 PM
Simply, it's the pre-clearance of United States Customs and Immigration BEFORE you get on the plane in Freeport or Nassau.
There is no pre-clearance of ships like Discovery or Regal Empress though.

]

So what is the problem if it leaves?

Tafadhali
07-01-06, - 01:01 PM
]
So what is the problem if it leaves?

maybe b/c it would be more of a hassle...boy YK sometimes I dotnunderstand you, you ask some of the most simple obvious questions that are so open and shut...its like you have multiple personalites or something...

Alien
07-01-06, - 01:14 PM
maybe b/c it would be more of a hassle...boy YK sometimes I dotnunderstand you, you ask some of the most simple obvious questions that are so open and shut...its like you have multiple personalites or something...



You just could not even try to be not stupid right?
At least I asked.

But another thing is "casualobserver", what would be the big differewnce from being checked in Bahamas, as opposed to being checked in the US?

Tafadhali
07-01-06, - 01:19 PM
You just could not even try to be not stupid right?
At least I asked.
But another thing is "casualobserver", what would be the big differewnce from being checked in Bahamas, as opposed to being checked in the US?

...time :duh:
you couldnt even think...talk about shallow perception of ideas... :sarcastic

Alien
07-01-06, - 01:21 PM
time :duh:



Why would it be excess time?
Dont you have to go through clearance before you leave?
:dgi:

Tafadhali
07-01-06, - 01:23 PM
Why would it be excess time?
Dont you have to go through clearance before you leave?
:dgi:

:jawdroop: heavens chap! :eek::what: do you understand what you read?:sparky: :taped2:
the title of this thread is...:sarcastic :shhh:

Alien
07-01-06, - 01:25 PM
:jawdroop: heavens chap! :eek::what: do you understand what you read?:sparky: :taped2:
the title of this thread is...:sarcastic :shhh:



Answer the f*ckin question *ss.

Are you or are you not being checked at some time at any point.
Why the big sweat over before hand...rather than after?
In my thinking...the time should take the same, because you have to go through some screening at some point.
Tis all I ask.
:gi:

Tafadhali
07-01-06, - 01:34 PM
Answer the f*ckin question *ss.
Are you or are you not being checked at some time at any point.
Why the big sweat over before hand...rather than after?
In my thinking...the time should take the same, because you have to go through some screening at some point.
Tis all I ask.
:gi:

I rest my case...:hammer: