The most telling thing about all of this is that the government did commission the (Sean) McWeeny report about the judiciary. Justice Lyons said that the report was not properly constituted because it was appointed by the Christie government, rather than the Governor General who is supposed to be a layer of abstraction from the political process. Hence it was Justice Lyons assertion that there was no separation or independence of the judiciary.

While Maynard Gibson denied this, she hastily appointed a commission to review the recompense of the judiciary, and the commission was granted it's royal charter from the Governor General on November the 10th. Among the commissioners are the governor of the Central Bank.

The telling point is, if Justice Lyons is wrong, and Maynard Gibson is right, then why did Maynard Gibson appoint such a commission as Justice Lyons suggested that was remiss.

The interesting part is that Maynard Gibson said that she would not fight this battle in the courts of public opinion, but did just that. She has still yet to appeal, but hastily convened a commission to satisfy Justice Lyons ruling, and had it signed sealed and delivered by the GG -AD Hanna to make it legal.

If Justice Lyon is so wrong, why did Maynard Gibson do exactly what Justice Lyons said should have been done in 2003 AND 2006?

The most telling thing about all of this is that the government did commission the (Sean) McWeeny report about the judiciary. Justice Lyons said that the report was not properly constituted because it was appointed by the Christie government, rather than the Governor General who is supposed to be a layer of abstraction from the political process. Hence it was Justice Lyons assertion that there was no separation or independence of the judiciary.

While Maynard Gibson denied this, she hastily appointed a commission to review the recompense of the judiciary, and the commission was granted it's royal charter from the Governor General on November the 10th. Among the commissioners are the governor of the Central Bank.

The telling point is, if Justice Lyons is wrong, and Maynard Gibson is right, then why did Maynard Gibson appoint such a commission as Justice Lyons suggested that was remiss.

The interesting part is that Maynard Gibson said that she would not fight this battle in the courts of public opinion, but did just that. She has still yet to appeal, but hastily convened a commission to satisfy Justice Lyons ruling, and had it signed sealed and delivered by the GG -AD Hanna to make it legal.

If Justice Lyon is so wrong, why did Maynard Gibson do exactly what Justice Lyons said should have been done in 2003 AND 2006?

The government has just filed its appeal. Today was the deadline...and they filed hours after Lyons urged the government to file its appeal.

Now tell me why the government waited till literally the 11th hour to file, and why did Lyons have to make his ruling on the failure to file an appeal before they decided to scurry to the Supreme Court? **shakes head**

hmmmmmmmmmm, dam good questions!!!!!!!!!

The most telling thing about all of this is that the government did commission the (Sean) McWeeny report about the judiciary. Justice Lyons said that the report was not properly constituted because it was appointed by the Christie government, rather than the Governor General who is supposed to be a layer of abstraction from the political process. Hence it was Justice Lyons assertion that there was no separation or independence of the judiciary.

While Maynard Gibson denied this, she hastily appointed a commission to review the recompense of the judiciary, and the commission was granted it's royal charter from the Governor General on November the 10th. Among the commissioners are the governor of the Central Bank.

The telling point is, if Justice Lyons is wrong, and Maynard Gibson is right, then why did Maynard Gibson appoint such a commission as Justice Lyons suggested that was remiss.

The interesting part is that Maynard Gibson said that she would not fight this battle in the courts of public opinion, but did just that. She has still yet to appeal, but hastily convened a commission to satisfy Justice Lyons ruling, and had it signed sealed and delivered by the GG -AD Hanna to make it legal.

If Justice Lyon is so wrong, why did Maynard Gibson do exactly what Justice Lyons said should have been done in 2003 AND 2006?

Things that make you go hmmmmm.

Is it that Perry G is asleep at the wheel, was it that Alfred Sears is all slow talk and no action... he was bad at education and now this proves that he was worst as the AG....,

What is up with these responsible Ministers of the PLP...,

Justice Lyions is right, the entire cabinet should resign..., we all know more then half of them are involved in some plublic scandal..., you name the scandle and I will call the minister name..,

Name and I will call them out... come on de readhead, you gone pretty silent...,

Is it that Perry G is asleep at the wheel, was it that Alfred Sears is all slow talk and no action... he was bad at education and now this proves that he was worst as the AG....,
What is up with these responsible Ministers of the PLP...,
Justice Lyions is right, the entire cabinet should resign..., we all know more then half of them are involved in some plublic scandal..., you name the scandle and I will call the minister name..,
Name and I will call them out... come on de readhead, you gone pretty silent...,

i can hear the comeback now .. the FNM had their scandals .. we never heard about them .. but they supposedly had them .... :driving:

Well let's see what the AG will have to say about this one.....

Justice Lyions is right, the entire cabinet should resign..., we all know more then half of them are involved in some plublic scandal..., you name the scandle and I will call the minister name..,
Name and I will call them out...


Sounds like you have your own deck of cards. So who is the queen of hearts?

i can hear the comeback now .. the FNM had their scandals .. we never heard about them .. but they supposedly had them .... :driving:
:biggie: Supposedlly?

Minister Gibson's illogical and stupid statesment in parliament is unbecoming of an Attorney General. How in the world can a Barrister, not to speak of the chief defender of the Judiciary say that the learn judge has misled the Bahamian public? She must have lost her damn mind.

How can a judge's judgement be misleading? She know quite well until an appeal is made on the judges Ruling and that ruling is overturn that judge's ruling is law. Is there anybody in the PLP who has not lost their damn mind! Unbelievable!!

The most telling thing about all of this is that the government did commission the (Sean) McWeeny report about the judiciary. Justice Lyons said that the report was not properly constituted because it was appointed by the Christie government, rather than the Governor General who is supposed to be a layer of abstraction from the political process. Hence it was Justice Lyons assertion that there was no separation or independence of the judiciary.


So let's analyse this shall we...
We all know the govenor general performs his duties base on the recommendation of the prime minister and at times after consultation with the opposition leader. That being said, that bull crap suggesting the govenor general suppose to be "a layer of abstraction from the political process" makes no sense. Its a plp govenor general....typically, its like here sign this and lets move on...what his judge talking about...

Minister Gibson's illogical and stupid statesment in parliament is unbecoming of an Attorney General. How in the world can a Barrister, not to speak of the chief defender of the Judiciary say that the learn judge has misled the Bahamian public? She must have lost her damn mind.
How can a judge's judgement be misleading? She know quite well until an appeal is made on the judges Ruling and that ruling is overturn that judge's ruling is law. Is there anybody in the PLP who has not lost their damn mind! Unbelievable!!

Actually, I blame the weak opposition...clearly they do not deserve to be the government of this country. As it seems as if they too are lost without direction. It seems as if our country is rudderless. There is no captain, no first mate, no engineer. All we have is an entertainment section: a band of merrymen playing their last tune as they ship goes down.

Actually, I blame the weak opposition...clearly they do not deserve to be the government of this country. As it seems as if they too are lost without direction. It seems as if our country is rudderless. There is no captain, no first mate, no engineer. All we have is an entertainment section: a band of merrymen playing their last tune as they ship goes down.
Dang you see that to aye? Starts to feel better,maybe I'm not crazy.Hehehe.

Actually, I blame the weak opposition...clearly they do not deserve to be the government of this country. As it seems as if they too are lost without direction. It seems as if our country is rudderless. There is no captain, no first mate, no engineer. All we have is an entertainment section: a band of merrymen playing their last tune as they ship goes down.

And who will rescue us? An inexperience neophyte? You is my boy but look like cassius them brainwash you. How much they paying you now? Just kiddin about the paying part... but cassius as leader? well, thats a different matter entirely.

And who will rescue us? An inexperience neophyte? You is my boy but look like cassius them brainwash you. How much they paying you now? Just kiddin about the paying part... but cassius as leader? well, thats a different matter entirely.
So do you truly see a viable option on the horizon? Cause what we got,aint cutting it.