![]()
Bishop Greene’s Comments – Part 1
By Apostle Cedric Moss
July 17, 2003
Last week, comments attributed to Bishop Samuel Greene regarding homosexual marriages were reported in our local press. It was reported that Bishop Greene threatened to become the first live Guy Fawkes if our parliament passed a law legitimizing homosexual marriages. Today, I begin part one of a three part commentary on Bishop Greene’s comments and the issue of homosexual marriages.
Irresponsible Words
Clearly these comments attributed to Bishop Greene indicate that he is very passionate about his objection to homosexual marriage. Many people are. However, it is irresponsible for anyone to even allude to burning down parliament (even if said in jest) if it passes an objectionable law. It is even more irresponsible if the person is a minister of the Gospel.
“Guy Fawkes” Aside
Putting aside the “Guy Fawkes” comment he is said to have made, Bishop Greene is to be commended for being courageous and taking a clear, Biblical stand on the issue of homosexual marriages. Likewise, Archbishop Drexel Gomez is to be commended for his clear stand.
While it is always regretful when people rightfully object in wrong ways, we must not lose sight of the substantive issue. In the present case, the issue is this: Homosexuality in none of it shades or forms can be supported Biblically. This does NOT mean that homosexuals are to be demeaned. Not at all…Christ died for them as well and they are precious in His sight.
Beyond Tolerance
Christ calls us to do more than tolerate homosexuals; He actually calls us to love them as He did. Does this mean that we should condone the sin of homosexuality? No, we cannot do so Biblically. Nor does it mean that we do not call homosexuals to repentance…we do and we must. The reality is that we are to love ALL people and help them to know God’s abounding grace through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.
Jesus Christ was able to love and relate to the worst of sinners of His day without condoning their sin and He is our example. In the case of a woman who had been married 5 times and was evidently “shacking up” with a yet another man, Jesus saw beyond her sin and without condemnation offered her forgiveness and eternal life (see John 4:1-42). He was not antagonistic towards sinners and neither should we be.
Moving Ancient Boundaries
But what is this ongoing discussion about homosexual marriage really about? It is about ancient boundaries and we are warned to not move them (see Proverbs 22:28). Boundaries that keep moving make life unpredictable, unstable, and unsafe. The ancient boundaries of the institution of marriage are these: a man and a woman. Nations like Canada, who believe they are wise and enlightened by moving the ancient boundary stones of marriage, will soon see their self created dilemma and folly.
Here is the million-dollar question: Exactly where should these “learned” courts and “wise” nations put down the stakes for the new marriage boundaries? Those currently lobbying for change only want to include 2 other combinations; 2 men and 2 women. But how can they “in fairness” establish the new marriage boundaries to exclude all the other combinations that some other people want. These other people are using the same cry of non-discrimination and equal rights so why not include their various combinations as well?
Marriage Combinations
This desire being expressed by some to expand the definition and constitution of marriage reminds me of the Cable Bahamas radio commercial about the various combinations of Premium Channels one can get. The customer in the commercial is being offered dozens of channels to choose from and combine and he out of the clear inquires about having popcorn as an option. After being turned down he remarks that he perhaps needs to combine his popcorn request with a request for butter and then Cable Bahamas might give it!
As irrelevant as this illustration seems, upon closer inspection, you will see it really is not. For those countries that go down the slippery slope of trying to make homosexual relations seem normal, they will be faced with many “marriage popcorn” requests. I shudder to think what the result will be because the grounds for these “marriage popcorn” requests will be the same faulty basis upon which some courts and nations have sanctioned homosexual relations/marriage.
Click Here for Part Two
Apostle Cedric Moss serves as Senior Pastor at Kingdom Life World Outreach Centre. Comments and feedback may be directed to: apostle@kingdom-life.org



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks